This is neat, but this decidedly a niche product with very limited application. I'm an old hat and I can't see the inherent value proposition in this, why is this better than static pages with hyperlinks? That doesn't and frankly shouldn't require a whole new protocol and client. That's what HTTP and HTML were originally built for.
I've honestly never been able to discern a difference in quality between 96kbps and 320, even while wearing my ATHM50's, maybe my hearing just sucks. 🤷♂️
Azuracast let's me stream up to 320, but I choose to use 96 to save bandwidth.
It's good enough for my purposes, which mostly involve streaming it over 96kbps for playback on wireless headphones. It's a small price to pay for the convenience of the automation.
That was my mistake, and I'll edit the post. I just verified that you are correct by checking a random subset of the MP3's I have. I clearly got wrong information from somewhere.
Spotify pretty much has them down from my years of use. Even if you're not coming back and listening regularly it will still update that playlist every week.
LastFM is getting my actual up to date listening habits as I use their scrobbling service with my music clients, including Navidrome.
I don't think anyone ever was lol. If reddit even tried something like that they'd be opening a legal can of worms that would cause them way more harm than good
A lawsuit requires them to be breaking a law. Doing a shit or even malicious job at something you volunteered for is not against the law. Mods are not employees of reddit. If the argument is that they're somehow harming the product, that same argument could be extended to the protestors and shitposters. It wouldn't hold any water in an actual court.
No for-profit is nice, but they are the lesser shit of the two choices we have. Remember that the Mozilla Corporation is a for-profit, the Mozilla Organization is a non-profit. There is a clear conflict of interest between those two entities.
I do and will continue to use their browser because it's the only choice I have if I want to stand by my principle of supporting a free and open web.
What are the issues I have with Mozilla? They're floundering with little direction and seemingly incompetent management.
They laid off a bunch of their key engineers while they continue to increase the CEO's compensation. They keep making half baked decisions with regards to features and marketing that don't seem conducive to their core offering, like the Pocket integration. They completely killed PWA integration, that only works now with an extension and third party software. They retired BrowserID. They orphaned Thunderbird. There's probably more I'm forgetting.
This is where ChatGPT and Codium.ai has been a godsend for me. Something that would have taken me a few hours to 1+ days to iterate on is now reduced down to anywhere from minutes to an hour. I don't even always see it all the way through to completion, but just knowing that I can iterate on some version of it so quickly is often motivation enough to get started.
If you're paying for the Plus subscription, GPT-4 with Code Interpreter is absolutely OP. Did you know you can hand it a zip file as a way of giving it multiple files at once?
We're the minority, if this gets implemented it's endgame. Try convincing the billions of people who already don't care enough to use Firefox to protect their privacy to now stop using Chrome because it's killing the open web. Now tell them to stop using services they care about because DRM is bad.
At this point our only real hope is the EU decides to forcibly stop this, but I'm not holding my breath.
You're saying this like Firefox is adding the shitty standard because they want to, and not because Google used their monopoly to force adoption of the shitty standard forcing Firefox to follow suit if they don't want their users to have a broken experience.
If Google introduces a shitty standard to YouTube and Firefox doesn't adopt it, do you honestly think users are going to care or understand and blame Google? No, they'll get pissed because they think Firefox broke YouTube and they'll move to Chrome.
This exact situation played out with shadow DOM, Google implemented it into YouTube while it was still a draft standard, so all non-Chrome browsers ran worse because they had to use a polyfill.
That is why we're telling people to stop using Chromium. If they didn't have this monopoly none of this would be possible. Mozilla has some issues as an organization, but do honestly you think the better choice is letting an advertising company decide how the web works?
Zetaphor @ Zetaphor @zemmy.cc Posts 7Comments 148Joined 1 yr. ago
This is neat, but this decidedly a niche product with very limited application. I'm an old hat and I can't see the inherent value proposition in this, why is this better than static pages with hyperlinks? That doesn't and frankly shouldn't require a whole new protocol and client. That's what HTTP and HTML were originally built for.