Zaktor @ Zaktor @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

111

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's not like the rich countries are self-evidently sober and stable in their politics and climate impacts. The richest one just had their own wannabe fascist and has both been responsible for a large part of emissions and rarely met their climate goals.

Unless this is a prelude to going third party, he's not spoiling anything in the Democratic primary. He's probably more of a play to deliver anti-Biden/anti-Democratic-Party messaging.

The US has worldwide taxation (so you can't just live somewhere else to avoid taxes) and an exit tax (so you can't just renounce your citizenship without paying up).

The exit tax would probably need to be increased to not make it an attractive choice, but it does already exist. I believe the current tax is basically "pay a 23.8% capital gains tax as if you sold everything".

Seriously. It was a solid first draft of a solution in a world that didn't have many contemporary examples to draw from, but then it was just left as a draft and almost never updated (with a few notable modifications for which "all men" were created "equal").

There's a reason we don't instill a clone of our own form of democracy when we regime-change a place.

Your original statement was that the lawyers on both sides have influence. Which they do, but only one side is responsible for all white juries. It's not a failure of the other side for allowing that to happen.

For a lot of people "unpaid time off" isn't a favor. You're asking them to pay to vote.

Plus the rules frequently only come into play if their work shift makes it literally impossible to make it to the polls. If they could wake up from their third shift job to get in line as polls open before making it to their other job at 7:45 sharp, then no time off for you. If you need to get your kids to school during that time slot? Too bad, that's time you could technically be voting, so it's not your employer's responsibility.

I have a hard time believing someone who throws both the "printed too much money" and "backed down on student loans" talking points at the wall is a real person with a coherent political ideology.

It's a wealth tax, those are pretty aggressive rates.

You can't exclude your way to having a representative jury. If the opposing side strikes all/most of the black people, none of your strike choices can make the jury more black.

Why Is It So Easy for Prosecutors to Strike Black Jurors?

There are no comprehensive statistics on how often prosecutors strike jurors based on race, but there is little doubt that the practice remains common, especially in the South. In Caddo Parish, Louisiana, prosecutors struck forty-eight per cent of qualified black jurors between 1997 and 2009 and only fourteen per cent of qualified whites, according to a review by the Louisiana Capital Assistance Center. In Jefferson Parish, where a quarter of the population is black, the split was even greater—fifty-five per cent to sixteen per cent—so that twenty-two per cent of felony trials between 1994 and 2002 had no black jurors.

I feel like the governor's vacation being cut short is not really the headline news event here.

Yeah, I think the statement was kind of awkward and muddled what at its core was an anti-trolling stance with ideological examples. They're trolling for those reasons and you can expect them keep doing it because they (theoretically) care deeply about waging that "war", but the problem is the trolling, not their motivations.

I started out in lukewarm support, but the comments on the defederation posts pushed me into wholehearted support. I'd mostly forgotten how exhausting their brand of trolling and disingenuous argumentation was, and now can't imagine voluntarily returning to a social space awash in that. I certainly wouldn't open a sub somewhere they could (conveniently) access, so while it may cut off potential users for your streetwear sub, I expect there are a lot of other mods breathing a sigh of relief to not have their volunteer labor made noticeably more time consuming because we have to give trolls a chance to be trolly enough to warrant the drama of a breakup. Much easier to just never integrate in the first place.

They didn't spring up from nothing, it's a r/CTH (sub responsible for a lot of trolling and brigading) successor instance. We don't have to pretend to not know who they were on Reddit, especially when statements from their admin still support "war on liberalism in the Fediverse" and won't punish users banned from other instances "for being an asshat". It walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and literally came from a duck. We can put two and two together.

The account you're explaining is a sterling example of why defederating from Hexbear is a good idea. I'd forgotten what Chapo trolling was like, but it's very much this. Just sort of immature vaguely-confusing "ironic" trolling over and over again. They're fishing for a ban and will no doubt go celebrate it somewhere else when they get it, but until they get it they'll just make comment sections dumber.

I don't even remember what Reddit's statement was, so trust in them doesn't enter into it. I simply don't see any reason to trust convenient narratives from CTH mods. It's far too cute a narrative from a source that absolutely would make something up for the lulz alone, let alone a story that also casts them as righteous heroes against cartoonishly stupid evil.

The userbase of CTH and other socialist subreddits only have that same narrative to repeat. Saying "they all heard it too" means nothing.

It's never going to be literally 100% of users on an instance. It's more of a balancing act of "is the communication with this instance a net positive for our users". It takes a good amount of unmoderated toxicity to balance out the benefit of just regular old communication, but it doesn't need to be literally everyone all the time.

The user didn't ask about being banned for breaking rules, they asked about being banned for "being an asshat".

That's also very fair. Federation only works if the interchange of users doesn't degrade the communities in each instance. If it's just a bunch of safe home bases that can go out and be assholes as long as it's somewhere else the whole thing falls apart.

If the reason for the ban is explicitly (as presented by the user) "being an asshat", then yes, the source instance should consider banning them as well. Defederation is exactly the expectation (from Carcosa in their post) if too many users from an instance go elsewhere to be asshats.

Do we have anything but the CTH mod's word on that being the cause? Because it's a pretty transparently dumb reason while most of reddit knew them for trolling and brigading.

Non-federation with a CTH-successor certainly makes running a community on lemmy.world more desirable. Back on reddit, before the bannings about 1/3 of mod actions were from TD users, 1/3 were from CTH users, and the last 1/3 was just randos. It's not like CTH was just a regular sub, they were the source of a lot of moderation.