Being unwilling to admit that some personal experiences do not equate to general truths don't make your views more real. Take a critical thinking course before spreading such half-baked thoughts.
Unlike metric, there isn't an international standard for this.
There is one, ISO 80000‑1. But it specifically allows commas and points. Which doesn't resolve the confusion. We really should adhere to one single standard for this.
I'll be more cautious now, when writing such numbers in English. Thanks for pointing commaing that out!
To conform with SI unit prefixes. Which is a good thing imo.
But according to Wiki the IEC defined those binary prefixes in 1999. And I find it problematic that so few still don't know about this and don't adhere to that standard. Even fellow engineers don't use it correctly. No wonder companies like Microsoft also still use it wrong. This keeps things confusing.
We believe delivering Nokia’s 4G/LTE system to the lunar surface is a transformative moment in the commercialization of space and the maturity of the lunar economy.
Remember that time, when it was possible for about 6 years to hack into any Linux system (without drive encryption) which had GRUB by pressing backspace exactly 28 times? Yeah, good old times.
Well at least they communicate such findings openly and don't try to hide them. Other than ExxonMobil who saw global warming coming due to internal studies since the 1970s and tried to hide or dispute it, because it was bad for business.
Being unwilling to admit that some personal experiences do not equate to general truths don't make your views more real. Take a critical thinking course before spreading such half-baked thoughts.