To those, who say "no actual children are involved":
What the fuck the dataset was trained on then? Even regular art generators had the issue of "lolita porn" (not the drawing kind, but the "very softcore" one with real kids!) ending in their training material, and with current technology, it's very difficult to remove it without redoing the whole dataset yet again.
At least with drawings, I can understand the point as long as no one uses a model or is easy to differentiate between real and drawings (heard really bad things about those doing it in "high art" style). Have I also told you how much of a disaster it would be if the line between real and fake CSAM would be muddied? We already have moronic people arguing "what if someone matures faster that the others", like Yandev. We will have "what if someone gets jailed after thinking their stuff was just AI generated".
Be informed that the US, in some states it might be still illegal, but rarely prosecuted, since there's more important things to do, like harassing ethnic minorities and prosecuting abortion.
I'm a game developer, and you can find my engine project at @PixelPerfectEngine
I also sometimes draw or do other similar stuff, and beg some of the smaller creators I'm following to get into the Fediverse, especially as Twitter is supressing their reach.
The fediverse have a better incentive to keep itself spam free. Our platforms are not driven by "attention retaining" and "user engagement", or at least until ads are not coming here.
It was on Twitter by an anti-AI group. Xon't have the link anymore.