YourFavouriteNPC @ YourFavouriteNPC @feddit.de

Posts

2

Comments

93

Joined

2 yr. ago

🫡🇦🇹

So where are we at right now?

"We didn't bomb the hospital, Hamas did. And even if we bombed the hospital, Hamas used it as a base. And even if they didn't, a some of them were in there. And even if they weren't, there were Hamas tunnels under the hospital."

I wonder what's next

Time machine, please

Source?

So it's still okay to take advice from you for now?

You forgot about ties. They're rare, but they happen, and in this scenario they work like the 0 in Roulette - they fuck over your nice and comfy 50/50 chance.

And as others already mentioned: I'm pretty sure that whole scheme wohl just be plain fraud.

Peak "I'm 40 and this is funny" vibes

My best guess would be Hieronymus Bosch

I never got the appeal of achievements in the first place. I see them more as friendly reminders than something actually worthwhile pursuing. Chasing them is only making things stressful and tedious, oftentimes annoying and grindy. That's kinda the exact opposite of any of the reasons I play video games for in the first place. If you want to use guides to get that 100% completion badge, do it. But if you ask me, your question means that you're letting other people tell you how to play your games on 2 different levels: first by the devs in telling you what "completing the game" has to mean for you and now, secondly, by strangers on the internet in their opinion about which ways to get there are appropriate. Play it the way you want! If you want to hunt achievements because it's fun to you, do it! And if you feel like referring to guides to get there, then do that, too!

I got my wife a Swarovski ring back then because that's what she wanted. Looks just as nice as any diamond ring, unless you really inspect it closely. And they come in all kinds of colors.

"The schlong choses the wizard"

Well there go my holiday plans...

Funnily enough: revealing plagiarism. Or even just judging the originality of a given text. Train it to assign an "originality value" between 0 (I've seen this exact wording before) and 1 (this whole text is new to me) to help universities, scientific journals or even just high schools judge the amount of novelty a proposed publication really provides.

Wrong, mine moves all the time

I love it when sequels DON'T include that the couple that fell in love towards the end of the first movie has now broken up again, just for the sake of some kind of forced tension between two character that'll just end up together all over again anyway.

On a side note, that's also one of the things I loved about Brooklyn 99: once Jake and Amy got together, it stayed that way. There wasn't this boring "they're together again, oops, now they're not" so many other otherwise good sitcoms used to death for their main cast (looking at you, Scrubs)

You've got it all wrong! It was actually an incredibly genius move, as the writers knew that after 7 seasons of twists, turns and surprises, the audience wouldn't really be phased by any characters death anymore. We'd become so accustomed to sudden character deaths that watching GoT became the literal incarnation of "expect the unexpected" and you can't shock people who are just waiting for it to happen. So what did the showrunners do? They did the only thing nobody expected, assassinated the only target they knew would still get a reaction out of people after all this time - they killed off the show itself.

My lactose intolerant ass would tend to disagree...

Ooooh, you're a mod. Makes sense you'd prefer a browser in that case.

Have you tried Boost yet?

Boost, hands down! It was my favourite for Reddit and is still just as amazing in it's Lemmy version.