Following the headlines logic: Germany is angry at this post right now for overgeneralising in a topic where there are a lot of fake news and and propaganda spreading actors. Germany will now go and make itself tea.
Insect farming is still worse in terms of Greenhouse gases than just eating the plants directly. While it is more efficient than traditional farming it also isn't necessary for a healthy diet. I haven't found a reliable study that examines how many tons of greenhouse gases could be saved by switching to an insect diet but I think it's best to just directly switch to a plant based diet. Just as a remain reminder: 14 % of global greenhouse gases are produced by meat production according to a UN study.
I find it easier to follow a thread if I can quickly tell who is saying what. I usually don't remember the usernames so a picture helps there. It's not a necessity of course
'It's raining' must refer to the same it as the one in 'it rains'. From that we can gather that the entity referred by 'it' must be quite capable as it can do the raining as well as be raining. However 'It's cold outside' could refer to the air as in the air is cold outside. Similarly the 'it' in 'it is the case' needs some context in a prior sentence or something else in the real world otherwise the sentence doesn't make sense.
Nicht so tief Rüdiger! it's in german though