Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)XE
Posts
2
Comments
988
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Do you think wildfires are a result of state lines? Do you have any idea how big California is? Wait till you find out dry California weather is not 100% related the general state drought conditions because of the unregulated almond farming factor?

  • Super models aren't somehow wired to only like other super models. A person's outwards looks don't tell you what they find attractive. When you see gorgeous celebrity couples, they're only getting that coverage because they're both gorgeous (Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt). Some remaining romance coverage goes towards couples where one is gorgeous and the other is talented/accomplished (Aubrey Plaza and Jeff Baena). The other 99% of couples don't get any media attention because it's not fun to talk about #4 sexiest woman of 2021 and her husband, extra #4.

    It's completely normal to be attracted to super models. They are literally chosen as excellent candidates for conventionally attractive builds and then dolled up to close the gap on perfection. Keep in mind, you're probably ignoring a huge swath of models that aren't your flavor of perfection as that varies between cultures and ethnicities. What you can hopefully realize is those perfect images have a ton of work done to the "base" person by makeup, lighting, camera angle, and photoshop. They're generally not real. Such gorgeous celebrities are so far from their perfected image that they often go unrecognized in public if not for some unique visual trait. Even just having an unfamiliar accent makes people doubt the identity.

    You want a real shock (assuming you're a straight male)? Look up your favorite porn stars without makeup. The picture is out there.

    You don't need to change your lust for super models, just hopefully come to realize they're a fantasy. And more than anything, those perfect 21 year old looks won't last. They may be perfect for 30 or perfect for 40, but not for 21. And that's OK. Your opinion will change as you age yourself. 8th grade me though high schoolers were adults. Now I don't even want to be seen with the babies called "college students".

    You never know who will walk into your life. You'll never know what they're thinking.

  • You're an excellent case for my point. Most car-owning households in the US have slightly more than 2 cars. An EV covers your needs 335 days of the year and a gas car covers the other 30 days, yet people act like that's why they need a 7 seat suv every day. I plugin hybrid will be my next move when I stop picking up lumber every weekend and put my little trailer back in use for the once a month "haul"

  • I just said I'll use one of the 2 other gas cars when needed and didn't even mention the bikes, but OK, you do you, ignore everything I said about having multiple cars because you're mated to yours for life or something. You speak for the world. You're the face of the majority. There's definitely not an actual silent majority of people who don't give a shit about cars, don't talk about cars, treat cars as a costly appliance, and keep buying EVs for their boring, sub-100 mile commutes.

  • Lots of people consider only their commute. They just don't complain about... Making it to work OK? Or don't announce it? The frequency of 200+ mile trips is vastly overestimated by anti-EV people in both terms of how often they do such trips and how many more people live in dense, urban areas. Lots of people already have shitty, dedicated commuter cars they wouldn't want to sit in for more than an hour as it is. A half-dead 2011 Leaf would still cover my 40-mile round trip. Back when I daily'd a Geo Tracker, I'd take my spouse's normal gas sedan if we had a trip. Or my weekend gas car. The average number of vehicles in US households that own cars is 2.3 cars. An EV can be slotted into most households without any real change.

  • And those weird products that make common, simple tasks easier (think: 90s-00s infomercial for like jar openers or soda pourers) only ever showed normal, able-bodied people badly performing tasks. Doesn't change the fact that those were targeted at people with disabilities without singling them out. The shown user is not always the target audience.

  • I'm always shocked by how unimaginative this tech-centric community acts. OK, so this version is silly for YOU. Are you the whole world? Are you the future? Stuff like this is typically a bulky demo unit in need of further development. Fringe case devices are also that - fringe case solutions. This isn't for the person sitting at home with a dormant phone. This probably has an application in medical and scientific fields where mobility is critical, staying in one device is necessary, avoiding a tangled external battery pack is preferred, and automation prevent human error like not plugging in the dead pack fully kor at all). Could have larger applications for swapping vehicle batteries, as well.

    So don't buy it.

  • That's not how it should work, but it does. It's a conservative thing to lack empathy. They struggled 20 years ago, so 1. It must be the same exact struggle and 2. Instead of making life better for all, they'll actively contribute to maintaining shitty life for these "entry" people because that's apparently just how it works.

    They want $15/hr for flipping burgers? I only got $4! (inflation is meaningless, intangible, and not calculable)

    They want more savings and less money? Stop buying coffee! (bespoke coffee has tracked way lower than inflation, making daily Starbucks pretty insignificant compared to rent)

    They want more respect in customer service? Why, I dealt with all kinds of bullshit! (as demonstrated by their shitty attitude, with less working hours, better benefits, lower population density, less stripped work force, local management support, and a higher percentage of people speaking the common language)

    It's not walking a mile in their shoes, to them. It's walking in very different shoes and assuming everyone's shoes are the same. Just look at any meth overdose death story when it's a nice white girl. She just made a mistake, or got tricked, or was down on hard times. If the case looks like their own daughter, there's empathy. Anyone else? Victim's fault.

  • I assumed it was just very high octane, often available at stations near race tracks. Regular (US system at sea level) is 87, premium is 93, "race" is 105-110. Could be used in dedicated race cars or ones set up to be retuned on site at the track

  • For those who want to laugh at the headline and not take 3 minutes to read the article:

    An investigation of Livelsberger’s searches through ChatGPT indicate he was looking for information on explosive targets, the speed at which certain rounds of ammunition would travel and whether fireworks were legal in Arizona.

    Kevin McMahill, sheriff of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, called the use of generative AI a “game-changer” and said the department was sharing information with other law enforcement agencies.

    So the embarrassment comes from the sheriff's response, thinking ChatGPT is a game changer for its... Advanced googling and potential hallucinations.

    Anyway, while I don't want to fuel better terrorism, the gearhead in me is seething with this other part.

    stopped to pour race-grade fuel into the vehicle, which it then dripped

    High octane gas is not extra spicy gasoline. Race gas is not super spicy gasoline. The higher the octane, the less flammable it is. Marginally, but octane is not an explosiveness rating. It's literally anti explosiveness - called anti-knock capability. Knock is when the fuel/air mixture self ignites, namely before the spark. High performance engines tend to have higher compression and run hotter, making predetonaion (knock) more likely. Higher octane fights this condition so it combust at the correct time.

    Stop putting high octane in cars that say use regular. Some can account for it, but high octane is wasted on many normal cars. And it's not cleaner. Gas station chains may add cleaners to upsell you on vpower or invigorate, but that's just a marketing ploy. Get injector cleaner once a year for a lot cheaper if you must.

  • I would guess those men are afraid the woman will curtail the man's spending, take control of financial desicions, make larger choices about their lives, and have free will over various entertainment and social activities. Because that's what he'd do with reversed roles. It's fear by projection. Throw in gaslighting and obstruction and I feel like I know the demogrqphic afraid of underearning.

  • Ace Combat 4 and 5 both made me feel awesome, then sad, then vengeful, and then awesome in their campaigns. They start as casual arcade styles, throw in some grief, grow the antagonists' justification, then the skies start speaking Latin and you systematically destroy some megabase. I was fairly young, so now sad Spanish guitar riffs cause me grief when thinking about Yellow 4 and 13. Is that joy? The memory of a fairly casual arcade game weaving in a heartfelt tragic war story?

    At risk of making this my only personality trait, Far Cry 2's desert at night was a treat for me. I seek out similar experiences in real life now. It didn't necessarily create that desire, but it was my first open world game, if I remember correctly. It didn't make me jump for joy, it just made me feel serene.

    I'm sure it was driven by the memes, but Portal 1 gave me a great sense of accomplishment. It was mild reaction skill with some decent logic puzzles. The build up, the turn, the fight, the final song. Quite a trip.

    Overall most joy might go to Forza Horizon 1. First open world Forza title, first (for me?) open world racing game with decent driving mechanics, excellent variety of cars, hit me at my peak interest in house music and other EDM, showed me Colorado scenery I'd see IRL 10 years later, and the campaign was focused around the Woodstock of a [cars X EDM] festival. I wish that was real and I wish the scene would be respectful. But, unfortunately, you can't control 300 drivers and prevent them from one-upping each other and making it dangerous and disrespectful. And you gotta pay for parking everywhere nice. See: h2o, ocean city Maryland.