XeroxCool @ XeroxCool @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

959

Joined

2 yr. ago

Make it Bun Dem by Skrillex and Damien Marley

I'm glad you enjoyed the song. I don't know your age, but seeing that screenshot made me realize how hard it'd be to explain the popularity of dubstep and, in particular, Skrillex to anyone who wasn't there. Same goes for the immortalization of the "oh my god!" featured in Nice Sprites and Scary Monsters, screamed by the girl who stacked cups in record time. Or stacking cups. This feels like the making of an "onion tied to my belt" type of rambling story. I imagine most of this platform was there for dubstep and that the young adults today had way more internet access than I did as a kid, so it's probably not even unknown yet.

The song shuffles into my playlist sometimes and takes me back to both that game moment and the generalized memory of blasting that from my ipod nano into my grandpa's handmedown Ford Taurus with the headphone wire I hardwired into the cassette deck. If you think dubstep sounds bad now, I made it sound worse.

What a coincidence. I looked up the Key & Peele skit about dubstep. My exact generation of Taurus is involved, identified by the circular rear window. The skit is worth it on its own, of course

https://youtu.be/5Kod1q39ddE

Your request has been sent to NASA's shared inbox. Please allow 1-35 weeks for them to find it.

Please check that the recipient list is not [human population] before clicking "Reply All"

Will this further fuck up the inaccurate nature of AI results? While I'm rooting against shitty AI usage, the general population is still trusting it and making results worse will, most likely, make people believe even more wrong stuff.

This was his breakout and now everyone expects his fake accent! But definitely Chek out his little live action FC3 scene where he tortures McLovin if not already seen (assuming it holds up as well as I remember, being a decade later and a decade older)

FC3 was the first to make drug trips part of story progression (leaving a little leeway for FC2's malaria bouts). FC4 had a lot of "spiritual" events. FC5 played a lot with Bliss trips. I'm wrapping up FC6 now and was just saying "man, where are all the hallucinatory story arcs?". Then I did the Oluso mission (panther amigo) and felt at home for a minute. It didn't last long, but I guess the reward is bringing back a little supernatural power to the game, late in the campaign.

Or believe you'll be a billionaire once your side takes over. Every viewer I've talked to believes in systemic financial hardship, but believes it's because of monetary inconveniences placed:

1. on them individually (by way of taxes),
2. on companies (socio-economic and environmental regulations preventing corporate benevolence from paying more to employees),
3. And on the global economy by poorer countries taking our jobs with cheap labor and lesser regulation (somehow absolving American companies as the cause of outsourcing due to #2)

2025 Model 3: 186"L x 73"W x 57"H
2025 Audi A4 Sedan: 188"L x 73"W x 56"H
2025 Chevy Malibu: 194"L x 73"W x 57"H
2004 Ford Taurus: 198"L x 73"W x 56"H
2025 Mercedes CLA: 185"L x 73"W x 55"H
2025 Nissan Leaf: 176"L x 71"W x 61"H
2025 Audi A3 Sedan: 177"L x 72"W x 56"H

What do you mean the Model 3 is huge? It's small by American standards and standard by European executive compacts. Compared to what, a Leaf? If the Leaf had a sedan counterpart, it'd be the same size as the 3. Vice versa if the 3 had a hatch version, as a hatch is often about 9" shorter than a sedan of the same model. Of all the things against Tesla, I can't say I've heard anyone call the 3 big. If you're not in North America, I'm not familiar with the compacts and hatches, but that's why I threw in the Germans I know

Thanks for all that extra detail. I'll put it on a watch list to see where it goes. I'll just go play in traffic for now

How would you describe the driving mechanics? I tried NFS Heat to feel that retro night vibe, but the mechanics were atrocious in my opinion. They're too arcadey. Forza Horizon has become my standard for a balance between realistic (predictable) mechanics without punishing me for every mistake. I don't mind Forza Motorsports but I'm more interested in cruising and racing stylistic cars more than perfecting lap times.

Is it open world? Japan and JDM aren't that big in my automotive enthusiasm scale but there's something deeply nostalgic when I can ride through some highway lights, virtual or real, that resemble the Japan track from Gean Turismo 1 or 2

Since everyone is excited to point out the pre-existence of shite and muck, I'll share the one I thought was a computer age typo but wasn't: finna. "I'm finna get dinner". I swore it was a keyboard typo of "gonna" with G and O shifted one key to the left working itself into verbal vernacular. Instead, "gonna" is to "going to" as "finna" is to "fixing to". Just as OP hasn't heard British slang, this was something I hadn't heard from US Southern slang

This is what I believe will always be the root of democrat's inaction: too many directions for improvement. Both sides want the country to be better, right? So let's talk about what the democrats, liberals, and progressives want. They want, in no particular order, reproductive freedom, religious freedom, racial equality, gender equality, socialist welfare, cheaper and more effective healthcare, reduced citizen financial burden, cleaner air, healthier ecosystems, more efficient transportation, more efficient energy production, and global societal cooperation, to name a dozen. What do we tackle first? Some would say reproductive freedom is of the utmost importance because that will cause society to collapse the fastest. Some say climate change policy is the most important because the irreversible damage is growing exponentially. Then some would say the financial crisis is the priority because none of the rest matters if the population is pushed to homeless starvation. 13 theoretical representatives push 13 different utopian priorities.

Now say there's 20 reps in total, 7 being republicans and conservatives. What would make the country better for them? Well, looking at the much less diverse demographic, take half of the above goals but append "white, Christian, patriarchal, wealthy" to the citizens they wish to appease and throw out the other half of the topics. Instead of providing progressive policy that balances benefits for all citizens, they smaller group: the "majority" of the nation that represents only about 1/3 of the population. All these 7 conservatives have to do is fold their arms and say no to whatever policy the liberals are pushing. They don't have to agree on how to best revert the country back to the good old days when liberal subgroups give them easy targets. Reject wildlife restrictions and their constituents will feel good because it's not their forest. Reject clean air acts because their constituents will believe the air is the way it is. Reject social welfare because their constituents believe the money saved will make them wealthy. Reject reproductive freedom because their constituents will blame it all on personal choice for others, God's mysterious ways for themselves. Reject gender equality because their constituents believe in the patriarchy. Reject global cooperative initiatives bevause their constituents believe America is a freestanding nation.

13 democrats line up as individuals while 7 Republicans stand with elbows linked, calling "red rover, red rover, send your policies over" ready to block it as a team of negativity. To break through the wall, democrats have to compromise with each other first on the division of resources, watering down each of their goals. The it gets watered down again with something that might pass the whole group. Multiple policies get tied together as one big bill, not one item at a time. This is what makes it so frustrating when any rep gets called out for voting against some bill that supposedly is clearly for the benefit of the country. It's most like 15 different topics strung together and whatever their priority is doesn't align with its representation within that bill. Yet, voting by party lines is the only way to move forward. If they agree with the bill, then they're flopping on their core values.

Then, sprinkle in some key single-issue voter topics and you'll probably get the attention of swing voters and non-voters. I'm in a liberal area. The sane people I've talked to that turn out to vote republican are always dead set on one topic. Sometimes, they're quiet Christians that are anti-abortion. Sometimes they're hunters that shut down as soon as a liberal mentions gun control. Sometimes they're rural people who believe petroleum vehicles will be outlawed. Sometimes they believe the capitalist machine will reward them for being honest workers as soon as the corporation catches a windfall. Sometimes the techy types want nothing but net neutrality first.

The GOP machine is working exactly as designed with a dozen single issues to snag voters and blockade progress.

While I never use the alarm function, I love having my bedside alarm clock because it has a projector that puts the time on the ceiling. It's convenient when your bedside table is lower than your mattress

I understand your concern, but every app should now have volume override. My native Android alarm and Alarm Clock Extreme has worked flawlessly for years despite my phone always on vibrate. Extreme makes me do math or a captcha before dismissing

"Some of you will die, but that's a risk I'm willing to take"

I believe this is already the case with pacemakers

Scott Swift didn't create Big Machine Records. The guy who did, approached Taylor playing in a venue as he was starting the label. The supposed sequence of events is Scott invested after she was signed, resulting in less than a 3% stake. When BM was sold, Scott sold his stake for $15mil. I would think his initial investment, before Taylor had a few albums under her belt, was somewhere around what middle-class parents provide for college tuition.

So, priveleged with 2 parents, a relocation to her dad's Nashville branch, and a normal middle class financial backing? Sure. Art is incredibly hard to be successful in. But still, I never see these comments portraying it as $50-100k. They come across as $30mil+.

And no, I'm not a swifty. I can't stand her music. It's not for me. Country and pop are boring to me and her melodies are too happy. I can't stand the fan base for treating her like god. I kinda enjoy drawing parallels between her lyrics and those of Slipknot because they're both singing for the unloved outsider and then watching the brainwash meltdown. It's like Tool for women.

It just seems weird to me to only ever see her get bashed for such a priveleged upbringing when 1. We can agree it's the only way to make it and 2. It's thousands, not millions that propped her up.

The incentive is that Amazon can charge more for premium sellers to have private bins that safeguard against fraud

May I Mike a suggestion? Try lowering the camera to just a hand or two above the ground. It might change this from "skull on the forest floor" to "skull in a forest" and add depth and context

I see this opinion often enough, so I have to ask. How much money do you think Swift's parents put into her career? How big do you think a parental college fund should be to give their kids a solid leg up? How does that initial financial backing discredit her as she continues writing a massive catalog of successful songs?