If you make the point simpler it works. "We are banning tiktok because it is a social media platform we have no ability to censor"
I won't argue against that.
with this in mind it makes sense to say "its because of isreal-palastine" because that is just a facet of not having control over platform censorship.
This part is illogical though. Claiming that due to a future event, we went back in time to block/and-or control a message makes no sense. This was my entire point. They are blocking it for many reasons and have been for years, but claiming the whole reason they spent years attempting to block it because of a single event that happened years later makes no sense.
The Tiktok ban, that was first proposed in Jan 2020, and was banned from government devices in Dec 2022, was getting first drafts for laws banned in Dec 2022, another law was proposed to block in nationwide in Jan 2023, was further restricted in March of 2023, and was signed into law to banned Tiktok nation wide on April 2023 (to be completely removed by Jan 2025) is solely being done to censor information about a conflict that started in Oct 2023...
there is not a single reason to use Windows over macOS--maybe if you enjoy suffering.
Or I prefer stability. Believe it or not, I found macOS to be very crash prone. Opening many tabs in a web browser? Crashed macOS. Transmission not uploading, so hit use random port to upload, Airport no longer works, even after reset. Run and tab between multiple apps at the same time, crash crash crash. macOS might be good for you, but it really isn't that great for everyone and really has issues.
Also, my time is worth more than minimum wage. When something isn't working, I need to get it fixed and now. Not make an appointment with the nearest Apple store so I can wait until the appointment and then waste my time going to the store (and the nearest Apple store is 2 hours away). My machine is a work device, not a reason to have to come in to their store for yet another sales pitch of why I should buy a new laptop instead of fixing it.
Oh, and for those prices, you'd think they would support the hardware for more than 5-7 years. People are complaining about Win10 "only" being supported for 10 years, that's nothing on Apple.
Or I'm a developer and shouldn't have to deal with Apple's BS. Or their constant breaking of software so they can "release a new version of macOS".
And that trackpad... Holy F, I've never come so close to punching a computer than that trackpad. When I two finger tap to bring up a menu, I expect it to bring up a menu where I tap, not drop a cm down and then bring up a menu that doesn't match what I needed.
Logic Pro isn't the industry standard, it's Pro Tools, and Final Cut Pro isn't either, it's Adobe Premiere Pro.
It's a bad headline, but I see where you were coming from.
The article does mention:
It follows news that Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, has already contributed $1 million to the fund. And Amazon has also promised a $1 million infusion into Trump's inauguration coffers.
So it was name dropping, but it's being done as a company, not the individual. Sam Altman is still mentioned as a single and not as a company again though.
Facebook and Google do not sell your profile, they sell access to you as a customer, same as Apple does. They aren't going to sell the keys to their kingdom. And Apple has ads in quite a few places. Search Ads. Apple News and Stocks also shows ads.
What you have described are data brokers, which is something different and has nothing to do with selling you ads.
I didn't follow these donation news too closely, but from the headlines it always sounded like they do it personally!?
Really? I've never seen a single article that said that. Even this one points out that
Amazon, Meta, Uber, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Coinbase, Toyota, Ford, GM, AT&T, Black & Decker, and Charter Communications are also making donations to Trump's inauguration fund.
None of these say Zuckerberg, or Bezos, etc.... (except for Sam Altman). Seems that it's companies that are the norm.
DNA of Apple is building and selling hardware, itâs only logical that they can be a privacy advocate
You'd think so, but when you look at their privacy policies and see how much tracking they do to sell you ads, you realize they aren't any different and never have been.
What I'm curious about is, according to the article, Tim Apple is donating from this own money and won't be donating Apple's money. Why make it a personal donation and not a corporate one?
While others are donating as companies (don't agree with this either but different subject), none are doing it as a personal donation. As the face of Apple, he won't get far claiming that it doesn't reflect Apple as a company, so why not just m make it corporate? Unless it's for tax reasons?
Don't have it, but after looking online, my first suggestion would be to go into desktop mode and then try starting the game from there to see what happens.
Seems people mention that you need to log into your Microsoft account for it and it can be saved/set to offline from there. I've had other games crash/hang like this because it tried to opening another window/browser window but it couldn't do it correctly in normal Steam Deck mode, but could in desktop mode. If this is it, it's typically a set it up once in desktop mode and will work in normal mode from there on.
Being unaware of popular culture isn't a badge of honor.
It can be, but Hawk Tuah isn't popular culture. They are part of a political culture and they shouldn't be proud of being ignorant about.
Not knowing about Skibidi is fine, as it's a senseless new fad that doesn't set out to change public policy and/or views. Not knowing about Hawk Tuah isn't on the same level as being ignorant of it can be a very bad thing due to its attempts at subverting public policy and views.
Townsend has a great YouTube video about the spices that the more poor would eat.
Nutmeg, cinnamon, peppercorns, and mace were expensive and so were desired/popular, but so are caviar, foie gras, and truffles today. But being popular doesn't make it what people really ate.
I won't argue against that.
This part is illogical though. Claiming that due to a future event, we went back in time to block/and-or control a message makes no sense. This was my entire point. They are blocking it for many reasons and have been for years, but claiming the whole reason they spent years attempting to block it because of a single event that happened years later makes no sense.