Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)XT
Posts
2
Comments
1,338
Joined
2 yr. ago

  •  
            HumorouslyAmusingBehaviorExecutorWithExuberantJoyAndSpontaneousLaughterCoordinator laughterCoordinator = HumorousActionPerformerCreationAndInitializationFactoryWithExuberantJoyAndSpontaneousLaughterCoordinator.createLaughableActionPerformer();
    
        // Invoke the laugh action method
        laughterCoordinator.performLaughAction();
      
  • tried to use it to find a job, never again.

    Can I ask why?

    Like I am not a big fan of the social network part, with people sharing stupid stuff and other things but for finding a job or so they can find you and see your experience and so on it didn't seem that bad.

  • The reject all is already a thing. (Well is not all all, but reject all except necessary but those doesn't matter much, they are not tracking).

    That said usually is not called this way as obvious, sometimes is just "reject" without the all, "accept only necessary", "decline", etc or you have to close the banner etc or they use some other confusing pattern.

  • Idk how it works but the spoiler thing is shit. Like there are multiple ways of making spoilers and some work on certain apps/instances and not in others... It's shit.

    Theirs works fine to me on Sync

  • Let's agree to disagree, I do not see that happening games, you think will happen let's leave it at this.

    Then regarding the refunds availability nowadays I would say that most platforms have it available, they are on epic, steam, gog, Microsoft, Google Play/App Store. Sony offers but it's more for mistakes when buying or for games completely faulty/broken, cannot test games so not very useful.

    The only big exception is Nintendo which you could get one contacting support on rare occasions but it's not usually the case, and when it is usually is a faulty case similar to Sony. And of course third party sellers keys.

  • What I was only saying is that for games it doesn't work the same. Because if the game is bad it doesn't matter shit if appears on the frontpage they won't sell it anyway. On other platforms they can game the algorithm all they want and that works because is usually free content for the user and at least part of it will be watched and they will get some ad revenue, for games won't matter.. they still have to make a good game not just adjust the game to the algorithm, otherwise they don't get any money.

    An exception could be gamepass as at least they could get some money of people trying a game and then giving up if is shit, since is a subscription service and they might get paid by minutes played or similar.

  • It matters the creator loses the money if there is s refund or simply doesn't get it at all if the user quickly see the bad reviews, on YouTube if the video ends up being shit he gets paid anyway, yeah maybe somebody read the comments before hand and yeah maybe next video you won't watch from him so is not zero result but it's not a so direct effect.

    Plus the parent comment was about the development of games I still do not see games development being effected to play with the algorithm, the marketing and hype yes but the game I don't think so. But maybe I lack some clear example of something like this.