Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
26
Comments
298
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • Played both Undertale and Deltarune on Deck, it works well with the controls. Enjoy! It's a great experience, wish I could play it for the first time again.

  • The mining is also usually a really polluting affair for the region, much more than the what power generation might suggest. And overall, in many countries there is a lot of subsidies going on for hidden costs, especially relating to the waste and initial construction. So it is not as cheap as a first look might suggest.

    I'm not against it per se, it is better than fossil fuels, which simply is the more urgent matter, but it's never been the wonder technology it has been touted as ever since it first appeared.

  • Oh, this brought me back to when I was in a psychiatric clinic as a teenager and I reacted like that to something, and this one girl with borderline was just about ready to kill me...

  • Could it be that you encountered a bug in Jerboa? I had images load cropped on top and bottom a few times now.

  • "If the RIAA sued hell, I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons."

  • We must imagine Sisyphus in therapy

  • Yes sir/ma'am daddy/mommy

  • Don't commend me too hard - it's actually a copypasta I found online a while ago

  • Ha, funnily enough, that is genuinely not all that far away from where I live, definitely reachable by train in 45-120 min, depending on circumstances, and I do have a Deutschlandticket, so don't promise what you can't keep

  • "Of in" sounds similar to "oven". In the context of the joke, "of in" itself has two meanings, while at the same time sounding like the word "oven". When you say you "of in", there's a clever triple meaning at play: "of in" could be referring to three things: 1. the act of inserting the food into the apparatus; 2. the presence of heat emitted from the apparatus; 3. a pun of "oven". The joke then makes the claim that "of out" is the antonym of "of in". If "of in" means inserting the food, then "of out" means removing the food; if "of in" means heat is present within the food, then "of out" means heat is absent from the food.

    Here's an example of a sentence that uses all the definitions of "of in" and "of out": When a food is considered cold, the heat from the oven is "of out" (absent from) the food; so you "of in" (insert) the cold food into the oven, then you "of out" (remove) the food from the oven once the heat from the oven is "of in" (present within) the food.

    The punchline of the joke hinges on the origin of the name given to the apparatus, oven. The premise of the punchline insists the name "oven" has to come from "of in". If a claim is made that oven is named after the act of inserting cold food into the apparatus (of in), then according to the joke, it does not make sense, because the heat from the apparatus is absent from the food (of out). Conversely, if oven is named after the presence of heat from the apparatus within the hot food (of in), then it conflicts with the fact that hot food is removed from the apparatus (of out).

    The humor of the punchline comes from the flawed logic used to deduce to origin of the name "oven". The logic is flawed in such a way that one who uses it to find the etymology of "oven" would simply be stuck in an endless cycle of speculation and end up never finding the answer they are looking for.

  • So, I don't want to worry you too much, but I might be in love with your girlfriend.

    And your washing machine.

    And this washing powder.

    We're working on a polycule right now, maybe you can be part of it.

  • But what, oh person inside my phone, what would you think of me, after hearing this shocking confession:

    I....

    I did not always comment...

  • Well, at least I heard there will be other people

  • Without justifying this really dumb act, because there’s no justifying it, [...]
    How about we just don’t vandalize private property. That’s a good standpoint to build on.

    Wow, how unbased can an article get?

  • How did you get this photograph of me, and how dare you doxx me like that? D:

  • You've got a great point there, actually

  • Now that you brought it up: I only today learned the completely legit and in no way misleading translation of what is being said:

  • That's what I suspect, too, but I'm not entirely sure in my research so far. The question I am still unsure about: Is it as costly in running, or is the real costly part "just" the "training our model" part? I wondered that, because when I was messing around, things like generative text models could run on my potato PC with a bit of python scripting without too much issue, even if not ideally - as long as I had the already trained dataset downloaded.