Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
808
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • Racist said a racism. Shocker.

  • no one can prove if their sentient you know

    And this statement just might be the best argument by example, that one could make in defense of that point.

  • Is it me, or did the article essentially just say:

    🤷‍♂️

  • They don’t want proof that what’s going to be happening soon, was ever mortally objectionable.

  • The next what girl?

  • …. While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers-

  • I guess maybe? Since technically, he did buy it, right? But this is sort of like calling the cops because someone stole your heroin, isn’t it??

  • I think you know exactly how empirically provable facts work. And I also think you’re a troll.

  • Again… WHY DOES HE HAVE AN APPROVAL RATING?

    Accepting this normalizes unelected officials having authority.

  • Yeah. 0 points. I either aced it, or I colossally failed it depending on perspective.

  • But they’re saying they do know. And they are correct.

  • I do know. It’s not sentient at all. But don’t get angry at me about this. You can put that all on science.

  • You know “Grok” is not a sentient being, right? Please tell us you understand this simple fact- because you just defended a computer program as deserving the same freedoms as a human being.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump