I'll be a bit scared doing that, with all the instances I've been thinking how easy it will be to have malware links. How is shi.t.justwo.rks or whatever less random than a malicious link?
Mixed things up and let me see some new stuff, I'd do it every few days to get a change of scenery. Now on lemmy I almost exclusively browse all because the content is lacking even with every community in one place.
Sure, if you're studying the effects of social media, you'll have to go on it. That's not what we're talking about though. Kids aren't needing to communicate through social media with other "researchers" at school. Not sure why you're equating school children to scientist doing actual first hand research, school projects are almost always second hand information, from the research papers, even if they're about social media.
But let's not kid ourselves, 99% of what students used YouTube for was timewasting. I didn't like it when I was at school but I recognise blocking YouTube was easier than monitoring every kids computers at school to make sure they're working.
They're meant to be using link aggregators like Google Scholar to find papers, not Facebook. Definitely not TikTok.
And idk what it's like in your country but the vast majority of research for school here was done at home for homework, where you can watch all the "lectures" you want. Kids just look at dumb shit when they're at school so they don't have to work. They also don't have time to be watching hour long lectures in class. You really don't need access to social media sites at school.
Imagine thinking I'm on a high horse because I understand kids like wasting time. Give me one good reason someone would need to use TikTok for school purposes. XD
I'm not sure when you graduated, but YouTube has never and will never be considered a valid source. You need to be looking at research papers, studies, newspaper articles and shit. At best the YouTube video might have sources in it's description and then you reference those sources, not youtube.
I think there's a big difference with an artist or OF model posting content and then linking to their stuff, it's still an ad really but at least it's relevant to the community.
These ads are just random posting, I saw the a hair transplant ad just in a random community. If they want to post a before and after pic in the bald community or whatever, that would be more acceptable. This is just annoying, bot like, spam.
I think they could have built up to it 20 years ago, it's just no one took the time to make movies, then establish the multiverse. Probably couldn't happen with James Bond because it's based too much in reality, but a fantasy franchise could have easily pulled off a multiverse movie.
Whole communities for one person just makes sense when you want to find what you're looking for. I could Google 'celebrities' and see a picture of the person I want to mastubate to every 10-20 pictures, or I could Google 'Margo Robbie' and have lots of choices.
DW, I never take anything as hostile really, it felt like a sarcastic joke to me (I'm British) but I wanted to get into a more in-depth discussion which I ended up getting because of your joke. So congratulations.
Read and comment to my other replies if you'd like, I'd just be repeating myself here although there are far more things wrong with social media that I didn't bring up.
Didn't the UK govt already try that with a gaming ID that went nowhere?