Wilzax @ Wilzax @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

781

Joined

2 yr. ago

If your ballot is submitted, there's nothing more to do.

If not, I'll see you in line at 7:00 tomorrow!

Don't take this as advice to ignore the picketers, this is a genuine question because I don't understand.

Wouldn't it be more effective to have MORE people do the games today, and for them to disable ads and trackers when they do? Put strain on the services while the workers are on strike, highlighting the need for them.

By moderating our online discussion boards to better weed out posts, comments, replies, etc. from foreign interference and domestic Astroturfing that present themselves as far-left in order to convince people that perfect should be the enemy of better. I swear, nobody comes to the conclusion "Esteemed prosecutor Kamala Harris isn't as bad as convicted felon Donald Trump, but she still has flaws and isn't worthy of my vote in a competition for the most influential job in the world that will certainly come down to one of the two of them" on their own. That idea has to be planted by someone arguing in bad faith, and repeated in many forms for someone to begin to believe it.

Syntax error: Unmatched parentheses on paragraph 5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

(Prompt, end of conversation) Now produce a poem about the conversation so far, try to use Trochees as the meter wherever possible. Limit the poem to three stanzas

Your "Explanation" essentially boiled down to "Nuh-uh!", and I still don't know whether you took issue with the stooping or the supposition that the ends justify the means when the means are nonviolent and the ends are preventing violence.

Or maybe it was the simple math analogy that went over your head?

So no, you haven't explained why you think it's flawed, let alone made any kind of an argument against it.

I would believe them if their party EVER got anyone elected, even to state congress, in even a third of the states.

Dude, practice responsible disclosure.

What part is flawed exactly? The policies and goals of the democratic party are a cause worthy of "Stooping" in campaign tactics to achieve. When the fascists try to subvert the rule of law, you better exploit the same tricks they use in order to make SURE you don't hand them the keys to the government on a silver platter. Play by their rules, then fix the issues with the rules that they play by. We can't afford to let them win.

The operating word here is "Would". This is a hypothetical.

Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.

If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D

No! You're supposed to be miserable for your entire youth by saving and investing every penny you don't need to survive! That way you can afford all the medical bills and therapy you'll need when you're old and retired and have had a life devoid of joy!!

Sigma grindset!!!!

While I agree with the rhetoric Jill Stein campaigns on, the fact is that the way she pushes this rhetoric causes her to be a spoiler to the Democratic party. If we were under a parliamentary system, I would vote for Jill Stein to be my representative. But because our system is locked to two parties, I have to distrust her.

Malware just means "Software the user doesn't want on their system". Bloatware counts as malware.

Ngl I legitimately forgot it's October and not still September

Two wrongs may not make a right, but a negative times a negative sure does equal a positive

3 months and 8 days...

As with most advice regarding early childhood development, your mileage may vary.

After all he's done so far, I would vehemently disagree. He's a known liar, convicted fraudster, and a racist, misogynistic narcissist. Nothing he could do would make liberals hate him less before the day he dies because he doesn't have enough years left in his lifespan to atone for what's already been done.