WheatleyInc @ WheatleyInc @lemmy.world

It is not out of the question that I may have a very minor case of serious

---

Read more

Posts

5

Comments

43

Joined

2 yr. ago

HOW DARE YOU! I am anti-skub.

You make a good point actually.

Why is everyone in the comments section oversimplifying this complex issue? Great reminder that that's what politics is now, blaming one side and naming the other side pure.

I just made a post similar to this, a bit better editing. But my joke wasn't as funny.

Not a game pass title, it exists outside of Xbox, I have it on Steam.

They're begging for a direct competitor.

A paid adblocker/ video downloader is worth 20$ a month for 5 people? Every feature in premium has a third party tool alternative you could easily use anyway.

They had a system in place that put more ads on users depending on how many used an ad blocker. When the users got used to it, YouTube realized they could push it on everyone and make more money. They'd survive as a business even if that wasn't the case anyway, Google owns them.

ArseAssassin would never. How dare you accuse ArseAssassin of such things.

How exactly is this a shower thought? (I agree by the way, but how?)

Upgraded my PC recently. I can now run Half-Life: Alyx, so I'm playing it. Best virtual reality game ever in my opinion.

No long form video content platform better than YT yet, I'll be switching as soon as someone can make something better.

Why shouldn't Microsoft be held accountable for everything illegal people do on Windows? Why shouldn't pharmacists be held responsible for prescription drug abuse? Why shouldn't a social media website be held accountable for users infringing copyright? If something is used illegally and the person who made it is held accountable, that doesn't really make sense even if you dislike the thing. For example, I hate YouTube, but it doesn't make sense for them to be held accountable for users posting copyright infringing content.

That depends on:

1. If the game is in Early access, the price is justified to change as it becomes more fleshed out.
2. If the game gets a massive update (Such as Quake II recently) a price raise feels justified.
3. Also, none of this applies if the game goes over 60$, you should never pay more than 60$ because of a price raise. But, these are all just my opinions.

Dusk, not sure if anyone here knows about it though. Pretty good game.

You can get both INSIDE and LIMBO for around $2.70 in a bundle as well if you want to get both, I bought it yesterday. https://store.steampowered.com/bundle/1837/INSIDE__LIMBO/

I personally love Linux, but it's quite complex and not as user friendly as Windows. It's not a good operating system for people without a lot of experience and knowledge on technology.

Just upgrade back to Windows 10.

Some games have a complicated enough Anti-Cheat that it'd be an absolute pain to get it working with Linux. Honestly, it's not worth it to gain 3% more players. I'd recommend just running a Windows VM in Linux.

It's as simple as this: -Politician does something illegal -Politician is caught -Politician tells their party members they didn't do -Party members believe politician because they're of the same party -Politician now has millions of supporters vouching for them not to get convicted -Politician doesn't get convicted

It's happened before, it's happening now, it'll happen again.