WaxedWookie @ WaxedWookie @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

1,078

Joined

2 yr. ago

Hold it in Palestine, get murdered by Israel.

Hold it in Iran, get murdered by Israel.

Hold it in Lebanon, get murdered by Israel.

...but Israel is less homophobic than them, so Israel's genocide is good, actually.

Are you able to explain why the Nazis were bad in a way that doesn't implicate Israel?

It's not complex - bigotry is bad, genocide, as the most extreme possible outcome of bigotry, is far worse. Some bigotry in a population isn't justification for a genocide - that would be an apocalyptic prescription if applied consistently.

You do understand why people would look at your prescriptions and think that you're either a world-ending lunatic or genocidal piece of shit, right? Why would we be wrong?

I'll ask again because you dodged the important question - Does Palestine have the right to defend itself like Israel and what would that look like to you?

Which specific 2 state solutions are you referring to? I assume it's the ~1994 deal that collapsed because Israel couldn't stop their terrorism and assassinations throughout the negotiations, and the Partition Plan that violated the UN charter with respect to national self-determination and carved out the majority of the territory to the minority Israeli population.

To defend the genocide of Palestine as a necessary lesson reveals a let's say... interesting moral framework - particularly as Israel escalates aggression against Iran and Lebanon. Putting aside the obvious genocidal intent, rhetoric, and action, how does an exterminated population learn any lesson?

Your argument is the best possible case one could make for the genocide of Israel - they are the regional threat and aggressor - they are the ones that (by your sickening logic) need to be exterminated to teach them a lesspn. The outcomes of the actions you're defending have civilisation-ending consequences one way or another, and zero benefit - why do you hold these positions?

My bigotry and genocide is fine because other countries have bigotry, actually.

What do you think you stand for, exactly?

Cultural Bolshevism > cultural Marxism / post-modern neo-Marxists.

Immigrants polluting the blood of the nation > immigrants polluting the blood of the nation.

unified Reich > unified Reich.

Hooray for populists that aggressively fight against anything resembling worker solidarity, planning to end democracy, convincing people that it's for their own good, and bumbling their way into Nazism.

Not actively, gleefully making things worse. Biden is doing this.

Working to stack the Supreme Court, and triggering a constitutional crisis in the process because the Republican Senate will refuse confirmation, and the Supreme Court that was stacked with self-contradictory GOP bullshit will agree with them would be the interesting move that won't happen because the Democrats are cowards and institutionalists rather than fascist monsters.

I can imagine there would have been an interesting dynamic between this piece of shit and fellow Bob's Burgers voice actor Sam Seder...

It shouldn't need to be explained why you shouldn't help a state murder journalists, but based on the downvotes we can already see in this thread, the genocide enjoying cowards and bots are doing their thing.

Should have happened after he started fucking with Starlink in Ukraine to aid a hostile state actor. Insanity.

Cancel culture strikes again... From the right as usual.

Palestinians killed in Gaza aren't terrorists - they're the victims of a genocide.

Since October 7th, 44,000 Palestinians have been killed compared to 1,706 Israelis. The stats over the past few decades don't deviate much from this ratio. Israel is killing many times more Palestinians, and a higher ratio of children, they're seizing land, holding many times more hostages, and committing and proudly documenting countless warcrimes.

Does Palestine have the right to defend itself like Israel? What would that look like to you? I ask mostly because you're actively supporting an ongoing genocide while blaming the victims of that genocide while applying inconsistent, nonsensical standards across the two groups.

Political violence is an inevitability. It's up to us to ensure we get the best possible type of violence.

Nor does capitalism to be fair...

It's certainly... something.

Ain't capitalism grand.

Owning shit isn't working. Why is this controversial?

Other than giving him an excuse when he inevitably skips out on the cheque? No.

I think it's more that he doesn't like reality, so it's simply not true to him... but he's not shy about lying, and is clearly losing his mind - ladies and gentlemen, I give you the disaster that's a coin flip away from running the global hegemon ...again.

Fucking over more that 345 million people to reduce his tax bill.

...now, forget what a cunt Musk is (we know that already) and ask yourself what made it possible for a person to do that, and why those choices were made. Repeal Citizens United.

I think Giuliani is Trump's portrait of Dorian Grey... but Giuliani has hit his limit, and it's showing in Trump.

Righting the policy wrongs is the first step, the easier step and the one they're faltering on - you can't begin to fix the damage the bad policies have done if you don't deal with the bad policies doing the damage first.

If you think they're done kind of complex dance, I'm comfortable saying that's a you issue, my dude.