The warning is there to remind people that the green arrow isn't always lit when the green circle is and normal rules of yielding when turning left apply. Green arrow still gives right of way
Yeah, but you have to got through hoops to maintain a veneer of a democratic and meritocratic system. Not for those who care to pay any attention to what's going on, just good enough to keep those who rather not pay attention to that. And you don't even need a majority to believe it, or even the majority within a party: just enough that people can be convinced that at least a majority within one party believes it.
I've seen a thread where someone suggested building a canal through the whole region and a replying saying to glass the whole region. Granted, they wanted both sides wiped out, because somehow a group of people within each region committing violence justifies nuking the entire region?
Not exactly common sentiments either: out of 100s of comments, those are the only two I've seen along those lines. No clue where they were and I'd they may have been removed by mods, making them harder to find (but mod logs do exist), so unfortunately I can't link to them.
Was it? Or is this the babies that were burned to death news? Neither is good, but technically the later still isn't evidence of the former nor does it prove intent (beheading 40 babies is pretty hard to do accidentally, and uncontrolled fire burning two babies can very much be an accident).
Either way, Hamas did kill civilians, including babies (pretty sure there was one that was shot in addition to the two burned), which is terrible and in no way should they be given any sort of pass just because Israel has previously committed acts of violence. But its still fair to call out fabricated news meant to push for mass killings of civilians, including children and babies.
I see 6 upvotes and 0 downvotes on the original comment and 3 up and 1 downvote (me) on this comment. I downvoted comments talking about votes. Guessing kbin just doesn't count votes from defederated instances, so its probably all downvotes from the same problematic instance...
that racism means “the idea that there are races”.
I think you would need to specify "the idea that there are biological races" for that to even remotely work and calling yourself white doesn't imply you believe in biological races. Like someone saying they don't worry as much about cops pulling them over because they're a white (male driving a truck through rural Texas), for example, is talking about the social construct of race and how that influences their normal interactions compared to their darker skinned pears in a way that criticizes racism rather than reinforces it.
Stop taking away the freedom of speech of those who believe “freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences” by punishing them with your disagreement!
If they were advocating, hypothetically, for the wiping out of Gaza, I'd have no problem with them being blacklist. I certainly wouldn't knowingly hire someone openly arguing for genocide to unclog my sink, much less for some corporate job.
I don't see what free speech has to do with that. Freedom of speech and association are a thing for all parties.
Companies who blacklist people for signing that letter should be named and shamed/boycotted.
Bill gates sphere is about 30 pixel radius and the all money is 300 pixels. So there sphere is approximately exactly x1000 small for Bill Gates.
Volume is difficult to judge, especially when its a 2D representation of a 3D object.