Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WA
Posts
0
Comments
411
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Exactly. Im not saying its not impressive or even not useful, but one should understand the limitation. For example you can't reason with an llm in a sense that you could convince it of your reasoning. It will only respond how most people in the used dataset would have responded (obiously simplified)

  • I dont have one, but its an important part of peoples lives, so i think about this stuff.

    The point being, that i have less issues with that way of resolving conflicts between your believes and scientific facts.

  • There is no one religion and they sure don't handle conflicts with science the same way, so which one are you talking about?

    For example, Buddhism in its core is accepting of change in the world and aims to adapt.

  • No I certainly don't have have all the answers, the people that think they do are a huge problem.

    I can understand the need for an explanation, but I simply don't have that need, although I like to know how things work. But if we as humantiy don't know I don't think its so bad.

    Yeah, if you try to change the facts because of your believe we have a problem. If your religion can adapt to new facts (or live besides them) I don't really care.

  • Thats .. Just your believes man

    If you keep away from social media as much as possible (as anyone should) its not so bad. I know a few people, that don't go to church but believe in god.

    No one feels great by being critiqued, but its necessary imho.