vortic @ Vorticity @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

543

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

I've been thinking of a solution for this. What if products were required to be sold in standard increments. No 11.2 floz, either 6 floz or 12 floz. No 960 grams, only increments of 250 grams up to 1 kg, then increments of 1 kg. It would make product comparison much easier and make it obvious when shrinkflation is happening.

How does he not just topple over? Does the shit in his diaper act as a counter balance?

Don't forget threatening to sanction the ICC over the Netanyahu arrest warrant.

Okay, I have a question. I would love to write my papers in latex, but none of my colleges use it. Is there a way to reasonably collaborate with coauthors who only use Word and for whom Latex would be confusing and difficult?

I do this using overleaf. It's been much easier to maintain and update since switching.

I don't agree with these religious nuts but, in this case, I don't think they're completely off base regarding "God given rights". The Declaration of Independence (not the Constitution) says:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

I wish the Declaration didn't include "by their Creator" but it does.

I wonder how this compares the the number of businesses that existed in 2013 that no longer exist. I wonder for two reasons:

• Is 38% similar to the typical rate of failure for businesses and other ventures?
• How much of the 38% can be explained by closure of high-risk businesses like restaurants?

Something else that could explain a lot of it is webpages that were always intended to be ephemeral. Political campaign websites for instance.

Thanks for the context. I'm not sure why you're being downvoted by some people. Given the timing, I don't see that this either constitutes insider trading or implies prejudice (even if he is prejudiced). I do wonder, though, if something happened in the news cycle around August 14th that might have prompted his sale at that point. I don't trust Alito to do anything in good faith around the subject of trans rights.

allowing them to profit through “normal/legal” channels prevents them from taking bribes or seeking other forms of income.

This doesn't seem to have worked. Thomas and Alito are the glaring examples, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that they all take bribes of one form or another, whether intentionally or unintentionally because their actions bear no personal consequences other than enrichment.

I think there is more nuance to it than this. Certain government officials who are in sensitive positions should be barred from holding stocks except through a blind trust, an index fund, a mutual fund, or some other vehicle that they can't directly control or influence. Those "certain government officials" should include members of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches who tend to be privy to information that would, if acted upon, constitute insider trading. This would include policy-makers as well as those around the policy-makers whose knowledge would create a conflict of interest.

That is all to say, I don't think that someone working in government IT, doing wildlife research, or doing HR work for a government agency should be required to divest from their stock portfolios. That should be limited to people whose jobs create an inherent conflict of interest.

I expect it's not the 40% who are donating. Its the officers who aren't pieces of shit. The ones who see their colleagues abusing their partners but don't feel like they can do anything about it because of the "thin blue line".

The last printed edition was published on Saturday 26 March 2016, leaving only the online edition.

source

It's not like it needs to go into a news paper. It's a website headline. "condemns" is only three letters longer than "slams" and doesn't sound lick clickbait.

I'm so tired of that word replacing "strongly criticizes", "rebukes", "condemns", "denounces", or "repremands". Why do articles have to use such a stupid, lazy word? Does it actually draw more clicks?

I don't understand why Republicans are so strongly on Israel's side at this point. I think almost everyone was on Israel's side on Oct 7th but since then there have been over 35,000 Palestinian deaths, including women and children, and their infrastructure has been obliterated. Israeli losses since Oct 7th only come to 260 soldiers.

Why would anyone suggest nuking Gaza? Oct 7th was terrible but it wasn't perpetrated by the millions of people in Gaza. It was perpetrated by the terrorist group that rules Gaza and, at this point, it seems they aren't much of a threat.

The only reasons I could see for nuking Gaza are:

• To kill all Gaza s before the new crop of radicals being cultivated by Israel's brutality become ripe.
• To try to create a broader conflict with the Islamic world.

Palestine gets new rights from this but it also triggers a vote in the security council on whether Palestine will actually become a full member. The US will veto and has already signaled as much.

Palestine gets new rights from this but it also triggers a vote in the security council on whether Palestine will actually become a full member. The US will veto and has already signaled as much.

This CNN article has a lot more information and context including who voted against the measure (nine countries including the US and Israel), the practical effects of the measure (new rights for Palestine to sponsor and support resolutions but still no vote), and what can be expected in the near future (a vote in the UN security council on whether to actually admit Palestine which might pass but which the US will veto).

I really don't think that's how that works. If you revolt against your employer, I don't think it's likely that you'll get to take over the company and continue running it.

My guess is that these were wealthy women who were able to afford the transfer. I highly doubt that the hospital or any insurance company paid for the transfers. I would bet that there were other women who were unable to afford similar care and had to suffer the consequences.