Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)VN
Posts
0
Comments
310
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The short version is: Because people are making and buying the batteries. Hydrogen has failed to scale.

    They've been ripping hydrogen stations out in the UK, Norway, California. Hydrogen may as well be Betamax or HD-DVD at this point.

    Edit: I’ll be quite happy if I’m wrong. I would love to see more widespread decarbonisation assuming the hydrogen wasn’t blue.

  • It’s why I don’t see ammonia being used outside of shipping.

    Scale won’t get to fix FCEV light vehicle transport because is simply chicken and egg.

    Unless governments pump billions into hydrogen infrastructure there’s simply no financial return for any investors. And why should governments do that when BEVs are already solving the decarbonisation issue?

    Battery technologies like Lithium Iron Phosphate and Sodium Ion are here and solve the material issues. And once the materials are mined they enter a circular economy.

    Fast forward 30 years and most new car batteries will be made from old ones.

  • Hydrogen has its own problems with rare metals like platinum and palladium.

    Even setting aside the energy loss, the cost of compression, chilling, storage etc is much more expensive than both fossil and ev charging infrastructure. Scale will help but it’s simply not there.

    I can see a future in aviation for fuel cells but for shipping I think it far more likely we’ll see something like ammonia fuel cells taking centre stage. It’s vastly more easy to transport and a leak at sea isn’t as big a deal.

    Light passenger vehicles? Never going to happen. It arrived 20 years too late.

  • Russia had the equipment (and a lot more) to lose. It’s quite realistic.

    How you can consider a two year war where none of the original goals have been met a success is beyond me.

    Russia has paid an enormous cost for very little in the way of gains. They haven’t even regained the land they retreated from in 2022.

    But by all means. Keep cheering on Putin sending his people into a meat grinder in his pathetic 20th century war of conquest.

  • I have a front loader that takes anything from 1.5 - 3 hours depending on water temperature, load size etc.

    It may tell me 2 hours when I start it, and still be going 2 hours 20 minutes later.

    The dryer next to it is even worse when it comes to guessing duration, so having a notification pop up next to me is helpful.

  • Mine does too but can run up to 45 minutes over time depending on how it adjusts the load, water temp etc.

    The dryer is a sensor heat pump dryer so I have zero idea whether it’s going to take 30 minutes or 2 hours.

    It’s a feature I find useful, I can isolate it on my network and I didn’t pay extra for it.

    Seems weird to be defending it.

  • I work at a company with unlimited sick leave and it's an absolute godsend for those who need it. Literally no one I know who works there takes the piss. In fact with working from home being a thing most wouldn't take more than 5 or so actual sick days per year.

    But I've also seen someone take months of paid sick leave when their child with cancer was getting treatment. It was never questioned, and it gave me enormous respect for the place.

  • Politically sure, but economically the USA is hurt by this war. You may as well make the case that it’s in China’s interest, or Indias.

    But that wouldn’t align with Kremlin disinformation that you’re spreading. Wilfully or not.