Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
4
Comments
552
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In what sense is a screenshot with scribbles on it "world news?"

  • Meta's platforms want engagement, not truth. They are positively incentivized to get rid of anti-disinformation teams, since the spread of disinformation will increase engagement on their platforms.

    Just one of the ways Meta (and Twitter, which is actively doing something similar) are bad platforms.

  • Why not post that, instead of posting screenshots of numbers and claiming it means whatever you want it to?

  • I do; do you?

    But of course what I’m actually doing is showing that posting pure statistical data, and then using it to make strong unsourced unattributed assertions, is very silly. If you have something to say, say it and post proof for it. A screenshot of number going up is meaningless.

  • In what sense does that follow from what you posted? Did you mean to post a different article?

  • Ideological similarity.

    Do the admins federate/unfederate from instances you care about? Do they ban/allow communities in a way you agree with?

  • Sorry, I know that's not Internet etiquette!

  • Even if that's true, that is totally not what the article is saying.

  • It's basically alt-right spam. Lots of Breitbart links, right-wing culture war mouthpieces and memes, etc.

  • This article has a very weird definition of the word "conservative."

    It argues that Democrats working to restore reproductive rights to women is a conservative value, because it's trying to return to the Roe v. Wade detente that existed prior to this Supreme Court. But that ignores the entire history of the conflict, which is that conservatives, traditionalists, and the Religious Right fought long and hard to undo women's access to reproductive rights... against liberals. Now that they've succeeded, they're not suddenly liberals and Democrats are not suddenly conservatives. These words mean something other than pro-status-quo and anti-status-quo, which this author seems to ... not know I guess?

    And even if you were somehow to say "Republicans are anti-status-quo and Democrats are pro-status-quo," in what sense are Democrats protecting the current abortion status quo? Improving women's access to reproductive healthcare is an explicit Democrat goal.

    You can use exactly the same framing to claim that Democrats are conservative about LGBTQ+ rights because they fight hard to protect and expand existing LGBTQ+ protections. But that's not politically conservative; that's still a liberal goal.

    Anyway, strange framing, Atlantic!

  • It's so absurd that America loves guns more than it loves children's safety.

  • NO! YOU SUCK!

    More seriously: downvotes can be disabled on Lemmy instances on an instance-by-instance basis. I have them disabled on mine, for example, because I too find them difficult to deal with. If you don't like downvotes, that could be an easy solution for you.

  • My opinions:

    1. No, there is no advantage to Windows server; yes, you are wasting your time. Most good server stuff out there is Linux-first or Linux-only.
    2. Yes. bind is the gold standard of DNS servers but can be kind of annoying and fiddly to configure. dnsmasq or coredns are excellent alternatives.
  • Wow, I didn't even know this existed. It is so explicitly fascistic it's almost difficult to believe people are embracing it.

    Almost.

  • Maybe but it doesn’t seem like a terribly good idea. All prior art for Lemmy, and most serious server stuff on the Internet, is on Linux. It would be a lot of effort and would result in a worse solution than the tools that already exist.

  • This guy is basically the worst, which is certainly why Russia and MAGA are so into him.