Vegoon @ Vegoon @feddit.de

Posts

2

Comments

172

Joined

2 yr. ago

We ded

Most likely outcome (high confidence)

still letting this here: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

Try this: https://makefrontendshitagain.party/

puddings

I thought for puddings soy works better because of a enzyme in oat milk that prevents pudding from going solid. If it works for you, great.

Also, for the record I’m mostly off human milk too now that I’m an adult

Don't worry, babysteps (no pun intended) for the win, you can do it!

Joesley Batista is a good start

Animal products. No, it was not worth it.

Eat the rich is the only not plant based diet I support.

Go vegan for the animals - and to stop supporting meat conglomerates owned by billionaires.

I think it is higher, the current food production is something like 25% of the global GHG emissions, 2/3 are from the animal industry. Besides the direct impact there is less land use and the opportunity to re-nature large areas.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

Even if we could cut all fossil fuels, the animal industry would push us over the Paris goal. Changing what we eat is a option we all have but let's not mention that

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

Billionaires like Joesley Batista?

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

No, I am against the prohibition of common terms, I advocate for a stricter declaration of ingredients. "Milk" alone could be milk from any mammal, cow, goat, human. Steak could be a cut from any animal, that is why a the animal it is from is declared. Oat milk is called milk since centuries but now the industry fears competition and is publishing propaganda and pays lobbyism for restrictive laws.

Right, but ‘steak’ does mean a little more than that. It also would indicate a particular kind of cut of meat, which would generally indicate minimal connective tissue, tenderness, location, etc.

So as long as it has "steak" written on it you just care that is any animal with those properties?

Would you like ‘meat-free’ labels allowed on foods that had absolutely no muscle-tissue content, but did contain animal organ, bone, and fat content?

I want a strong indicator that a product contains any animal products. There are already many labels for plant based products but none are required by any law.

I am in strong favor a big prominent "contains animal products" label. It would make live so much easier.

Do you buy "steak" as in a generic description for something from any animal, or do you buy bison, camel, goat or horse steak? I have only seen plant based steaks or schnitzel where it has it in the name. "Plant based product" or "product based on soy/pea"

Arch and vegan btw, get on my level.

This sounds kinda wrong, if you would put that logic in other circumstances we are at the argument the "anti-women-voting-right" argument from the crazy lady: Women should only be allowed to vote if they work. Or old people who retire, should they not be allowed to vote anymore? People who have medical conditions and so on...

or somehow block the empathy from their brain applying to animals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance#Meat-eating

Its a multitude of reasons for people to go vegan: The animals, their own health, the probability of not creating a living hell on earth. The reason why vegans try to convince others is often because after a few years most are so disconnected from the killing of others for taste where it is a giant argument. The suffering and abuse of 90 billion sentient land animals per year alone is for most good enough to stop supporting it. I have surrendered that argument for most discussions because it is hard to have that empathy while it is a part in your live. It wasn't for me, although is was not challenged in that view back then. So now my arguments moved more towards egoism which sometimes works.