Varyk @ Varyk @sh.itjust.works

Posts

45

Comments

5,046

Joined

2 yr. ago

you're afraid of concise, undeniable facts. not a shocker.

doesn't change the facts or the consistent point of this post: that there were real chemtrails, there were biological and chemical weapons experiments that the US government, military and intelligence agencies admitted to conducting on US citizens without consen, during their testimony in the church committee hearings.

swing away.

you making things up does not invalidate any part of this post, that has been the same from top to bottom.

the US government, military and intelligence agencies admitted to dispersing chemical and biological weapons by land, sea and air(chemtrails) hundreds of times on US citizens without consent or notification over 30 years.

this is corroborated by ample amounts of evidence, including documentation and the testimony of the experimenters.

all you're accomplishing by forcing me to correct you is spreading the truth about the 1976 Church committee and the inhumane biological weapons experiments conducted on non-consenting US citizens.

i love getting the truth out there, and it's not exactly painful to watch you repeatedly trip over your imagination and fall on your face, so please keep making things up that I get to correct.

you can check my post history, I constantly edit things to make sure people understand as clearly as possible what I'm saying, specifically for cases like yours. I'll edit them days after the post if I think there's a more concise and clear way that a future reader or you couldn't possibly misinterpret, no matter how little you read and how much you're making up.

you're welcome.

"wasn't trying to disprove chemtrail"

you tried, you failed, it was fun.

keep making things up, I said the same at the top as I am saying now.

chemtrails are real, the US government admitted it at the 1976 Church committee hearing

the facts are facts despite your bitter imagination.

no worries. I understand why you're pretending to be confused.

I have removed the word "radiological" for you.

you made zero progress on disproving chemtrails, the biological weapon experiments and the 1976 Senate hearing, but that is all objective historical fact verified by the US government.

you never had a chance.

"I don't have to imagine..."

you don't have to, and yet you insist that your fabrications make a lick of difference in face of the abundant documented evidence of chemtrails and weapons testing.

your imagination has no bearing on the evidence.

i see now, you've conflated outside unethical radiological tests with the Church committee evidence here about biological and chemical testing. no worries.

as far as I remember, the Church committee doesn't call Vanderbilt to the hearing.

my words are accurate and sourced.

your confusion, feigned or otherwise, is your own problem.

you missed many things. or are pretending to anyway, in an effort to find a leg to stand on.

you aren't going to be able to fabricate any valid rejection against the abundance of verified historical evidence, but imagine away.

you trying to twist the words of the 1976 Senate committee hearing isn't going to work, it's a 50-year-old completely verified set of proof provided by the US government and the scientists who conducted these experiments.

chemtrails were real and the US government tested biological weapons on people, as noted in the post and the verified sources.

your confusion over the evidence is completely immaterial.

which part about airplanes is confusing you?

the supplied evidence proving the facts of this post are verified, corroborated historical US government and news sources, comprised entirely of official evidence, documentation and recordings.

Verified historical fact.

you are fabricating incomplete theories rather than accepting the verified body of evidence provided by the US government and their researchers.

my links support the findings of the 1976 Senate committee hearing that exposed these biological weapons experiments including chemtrails, on non-consenting US citizens.

The evidence, testimony, documentation and recordings are all available in the provided likes and support the findings of the Senate committee, as well as the 1976 commission hearing in its entirety, which is documented and publicly available.

I understand you want to talk about theories.

This post is strictly about historical evidence, documentation and fact.

your theories are immaterial.

you can "think about it"(deny verified evidence) and fabricate your objections and theories, or you can read the provided sources and except the overwhelming verified historical evidence of biological weapons testing on non-consenting US citizens.

there is no suggestion anything on the church committee was made up and all the evidence presented during the hearing supports the findings of the Senate committee.

"large scale"

The entire city of San Francisco.

aircraft carriers.

the second link provided in the post explains the scale of that single experiment, Operation sea spray, among hundreds.

The US government has admitted to these biological weapons attacks, the senate committee investigated, recorded it and has the documents and recordings.

there is an abundance of evidence, testimony, documentation and recordings provided by the US government and the scientists who conducted these experiments.

"...more sinister connotation..."

as far as I understand from you guys, chemtrails are secret experiments using harmful chemicals dropped onto non-consenting civilian populations.

that is exactly what happened, among many other harmful experiments, according to the US government and its scientists who carried out these experiments.

Congressionally verified US military and intelligence agency testimony, documentation and recordings are solid sources.

you can check the PBS article, or one of the other dozen articles the summary on Wikipedia is based on, or read the linked 1976 Senate hearing testimonies yourself.

there is an abundance of verified evidence from the US government supporting this post.

you making things up doesn't change the facts provided by the US government in those sources.

these are historical verified documents and recordings testified about by US government agencies and scientists in a senate hearing.

your fabrications have no relevance here.

this post explains historical fact, not some stories you found.

The 1976 Senate committee hearing investigated and revealed the real chemtrails and biological weapons experiments conducted by US government agencies.

You're right that it's a conspiracy in that the US government hid their intentions and carried out a harmful plan; that is simple historical fact.

as the us military and intelligence agencies testified.

the us army and other agencies dropped chemical agents from aircraft, also dispersing biological weapons from the land and sea, secretly, as experiments on civilians.

that is established fact, according to the agencies and scientists who dispersed the chemicals, as testified to in the senate hearing.

"source for hundreds"

aside from the already linked sources you aren't reading, here's PBS explaining a specific couple hundred of the tests (a small portion of the tests revealed by the church committee) in plain English.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/weapon-secret-testing/

if you want to go into more detail or look at the hundreds of other tests that the US government admitted to, you can read the linked articles, the actual Church committee report itself and any of the testimonies given by the scientists and us government agencies who conducted these tests.

this is publicly available US government history.

"Give me your source for weapons"

the source is the US government. The US military and intelligence agencies saying they are b. globulii, serratia marascens, and many other agents, as biological weapons.

"In the Army’s words, these experiments “proved the feasibility of covering large areas of the country with [biological weapons] agents.”"

again, directly in those government and news sources I've linked to.

"I've been around the block too many times to fall for this"

...to fall for documented historical facts?

acquiring new verified knowledge is called learning, it's not a trick.