Varyk @ Varyk @sh.itjust.works

Posts

45

Comments

5,048

Joined

2 yr. ago

you literally don't believe in the fake electors game?

none of the convictions, none of the affidavits, none of the courtroom admissions reported on are real to you?

you just live in this fantasy world where only the things you've heard of before from YouTube videos exist?

I mean it checks out, but...you must have a rough life If you have to make that many things up.

I get that you don't like edits, but you should get into that because you make a lot of mistakes with what you write.

I use speech to text and then edit manually.

doesn't change the facts Jack.

I edited my comments before you asked me any questions or made up your little stories.

also stop talking about 2000, the guy was right about the 2004 election (that's another edit I made again before you asked me the question).

you can scroll up and try reading for a change.

"How is it defeatist, if it actually agrees with your points? "

because she isn't calling for a recount, she's telling everyone to calm down and just accept this possible conspiracy even though we all know that conservatives perpetrated a similar conspiracy for years ago.

she doesn't like conspiracies I guess.

The word scares a lot of people.

it just means a group of people working together to do something.

those are the facts Jack.

The very fact that you use the word blueanon unironically one presented with concrete facts is kind of tipping your hand.

but keep riding on your unicorns or whatever, I really don't mind if you tell yourself stories to feel better.

i know some people feel like they need those stories

get em, you're a legend.

Contact Info State Elections Division

Email elections@sos.wa.gov

Telephone (360) 902-4180 (800) 448-4881

Fax (360) 664-4619

Mail PO Box 40229 Olympia, WA 98504-0229

https://www2.sos.wa.gov/elections/contactinfo.aspx

you are making things up.

then you accuse me of lying by not agreeing with your fantasies.

besides, despite agreeing with me on all three points , If she's defeatist enough to support Trump winning this election despite admitting the evidence is they're supporting a recount, she's right-wing enough for me.

you are too, just like everybody else supporting Trump.

bye.

yeah dude, i didn't answer you before you asked a question.

do you understand how questions work?

go ahead. keep making stuff up, anyone can scroll up.

nope, sorry you're making that up too.

literally above.

I get that reading is difficult for you so you don't want to mess with it, but if you read, and then you watch the video you didn't watch yet, she says the same thing I did.

The guy was right before, we should do a recount, she just wants to pretend that "conspiracies" aren't real despite the elector fraud scheme that happened 4 years ago.

while she literally lists conspiracies that happen every election season from the Republicans.

I can see why you were confused by the video, but I appreciate its support for my points.

"This is a very comforting thought"

sounds like you're confused.

"that what you saw with your eyes, what was ratified by congress, didn't happen that way"

aw, you're very confused.

"People are smarter than that"

not sure what you're referring to, but I'm glad you did an include yourself in that bubble.

looks like you have no counter argument. do any of the facts here or the election fraud scheme that happened and that people are convicted for and are still being convicted for?

cool, thanks for supporting my argument.

you're just going to keep making things up?

super convincing.

no wonder you don't like numbers.

sure, that's how I referenced all of her points and showed that they matched up with exactly what I said and what the article says.

We just happened to guess the exact right stuff together about a video that's been circulating.

also, the first open letter was written by eight different computer scientists who are not the guy you're trying to nitpick about.

Stop making things up.

sorry I edited a comment before you replied to it.

you could have actually made a point.

must be rough.

I literally addressed her points in the other comment.

which part confused you?

she basically agrees with me.

the guy was right before in 2004, we know that Republicans do steal elections and try to steal one 4 years ago, so we should do recounts this time.

you didn't watch her video did you?

you just went along with the headline.

"It references the guy who wrote the first open letter."

did you watch the video?

her conclusion is, "that guy was right before, the Republicans did steal the election in 2000, but maybe he isn't correct this time?"

maybe. let's do the recounts and see if those votes are there.

I think it makes sense to listen to the guy who was right about the Republicans stealing the election last time since we have evidence that they tried to steal the election 4 years ago, like straight up admitted by the electors who committed fraud.

your video supports my point.

" Rebecca Watson right-wing"

Why do you think she's right-wing?

"Yeah, sure you did"

Just because you don't care about the facts doesn't mean nobody else does.

enjoy your nitpicking.

I've seen that trash several times now

mega heads have been posting it.

have fun making things up.

I've seen that defeatist video several times.

you are delusional.

I watched your silly video.

do you also not believe in the fraudulent electors scheme that has been documented and happened and people have been convicted for?

do you not believe in the call Trump made to Georgia to try to literally create votes out of nothing?

you can post baseless YouTube videos all you want, they don't contradict the facts.

very little action needs to be taken by the people in those States to convince their secretary of State to do a manual recount, or people in other states to ask their secretary of State to pressure the soss in other states to do a recount.

legislation is often supported or not based on less than 100 people calling into their legislator's office, so the more people calling up their secretaries of state and election officials and demanding a recount, the better.

this is not a baseless accusation, there is hard evidence that Trump's lawyers had voting software, and a historical and statistical and probability that The voters that literally want Trump. the election are real or actually voted.

The likelihood is that those ballots are not there.

with this much actual evidence, there must be a recount.

you should demand it.

call or email your election officials. tell me your state and I'll tell you who to call or email.