Value Subtracted @ ValueSubtracted @startrek.website

[Mastodon](https://mstdn.ca/@ValueSubtracted)

---

Read more

Posts

1,036

Comments

1,604

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

politics favors short-term thinking

So does biology. Immediate gratification wins out over delayed gratification almost every single time.

It's so weird to hear it referred to as "Netflix series" in the American trades...

In any case, I've been meaning to check it out. The buzz has been positive, and CBC has been promoting the hell out of it.

Chelsea did an AMA with us back in the Old Place when the book came out. She seemed cool, and fairly knowledgeable about, y'know, cooking.

I'd be curious to hear how the recipes turn out for you.

These are strange times indeed.

This election was so weird in so many ways, I think it will be some time before we fully understand what it all means.

Though in “More Tribbles, More Troubles”, Starfleet had developed quintotriticale grain.

They quickly came to realize that that's too many triticales.

A few scattered thoughts on this:

• The NDP are leaderless, and are therefore agendaless until they can get organized again.
• They're also probably broke, and in no position to fight another election.
• While they certainly hold a good position in the new HoC, there's bound to be some introspection about how that worked out for them last time.

Direct link to "Echo Beach" because it's a banger.

That probably means you keep good company - I would trust polls over anecdotes.

It's worth noting that in the months preceding the 1995 referendum, the "yes" movement was hovering around 37%. They managed to propel that to 49.42% result in the referendum itself.

Definitely not to be taken lightly.

That poll is cited in the piece, and the fact that separatist sentiments in AB and SK are roughly on par with QC (where it's still treated as a serious threat) is kind of the central point.

I wonder if she might recognize some scents from her holodeck...adventures with Shaxs.

I reject the framing of DEI as a "right buzzword." Don't let them co-opt it.

Unless the story is completely fabricated, I don't see an angle here. If anything, the slant of the article is pro-DEI, which is...not what I would expect from American propaganda in 2025.

I would imagine the devil's in the details.

Who's assessing the artifacts to make that determination?

Relevance to this story? What's the grand conspiracy in this case?

It's really not that complicated. If a typical organization is presented with two equally-qualified candidates, one of whom is a minority (of any kind, not just a racial minority), the organization will hire the non-minority candidate nearly every time. DEI policies exist to combat that sort of institutional bigotry.

For me, it's hard to top the Paramount+ ad from a few years ago that gave us this:

It was great. I had a ball doing that. And I mean, again, during the “Star Trek” world, it’s lovely people, and it was nothing but pleasure, and it was a dream wish fulfillment for me to be able to be in “Star Trek.” I play a very interesting, complicated guy, bad guy, I suppose. I’m a bad guy. Yeah, I guess I’m a bad guy. But yeah, so I dunno what more I can say about that without giving too much away.

I’m in more than one episode. I have a little arc through this season. I reappear and become more problematic as the show goes on.

I think the only path forward is for journalists to get serious about defining and protecting their job. No government is going to step in to do it because of the optics, but many sectors have colleges that define and enforce standards of behaviour.

It's time for journalists to step up and do the same.

I don’t doubt that this is true on balance