Fuck the judge's feelings though, "if it really was that important you should have complained harder" is an insane take from the worst kind of bad teacher attitude.
Yeah, whatever Trump decides to do with the US membership, there's nothing he can do about everyone else. He can pick his the US' toys and leave, NATO will be weaker, but Europe will still want an alliance to defend themselves, even if Trump tries to pressure individual members.
That'll be the question: who's gonna come to grab these judges, and who's gonna stand in the way and say fuck off. And then who's gonna drop their pants first, or who's gonna shoot first...
What you're pretending to miss is that those in powers are making sure that those people remain "illegal" , on purpose. In the first place, you're the one creating the situation of them being "in the country illegally".
The correct solution is to give them papers, not to deport them and treat them like criminals for a situation you put them in. Remember that the "you're on the table" argument that you claim is reasonable is putting them in prison where you can exploit them harder as slaves, it's only one step after what's happening to them already.
Everyone can be illegal if you don't make anyone legal and then claim they're only getting punished because they broke the law. There's nothing reasonable there.
Because he wants everyone else's data on it so that he can exploit it. He doesn't care about the data of his own people - he doesn't even want it recorded.
Hey nice, you found evidence that it's not a recent trend at all for Democrats to fail elections because they can't be bothered to even talk about anything left enough. 40 years it is.
Not having sex doesn't make you at fault. Rapists make that claim to pretend they're right. But they are not, they are lying. Only rapists defend that lie.
You start from the conclusion that it makes you at fault, and you deduce that it must be part of the vow. Your reasoning is nonsense, you are trying to justify a conclusion that is already wrong by inventing a premise that doesn't exist.
There is no such thing as a promise for sex in marriage vows, you fucking clown.
France Explicitly criminalised The law criminalises rape, including spousal rape, and domestic violence, and the government generally enforced the law effectively. The Court of Cassation authorized prosecution of spouses for rape or sexual assault in 1990. In 1994, Law 94-89 criminalised marital rape; a second law, passed 4 April 2006, makes rape by a partner an aggravating circumstance in prosecuting rape. (Article 222-24(11) of the Criminal Code)
I figure the crux of an argument would more likely rest on defining consent, which is where there's always progress to be made.
Also there was a massive trial that ended just recently about the mass rapes of a wife who was drugged to sleep by her husband and offered to people for years without her knowledge. Of the 50 guys including the husband, most of them got prison I think.
By calling it "starting a war" (which is a lie) and insisting that it has never gone well, you are implying that they should lie down and let Israel genocide them. Because that's how that goes.
You're mixing up what people say and what they think. Biden and Blinken both denied the war crimes and the genocide, and we have evidence that they knew what it was. Nazi Germany might have spread propaganda about security, but they DEFINITELY knew they were exterminating entire "races". Maybe not the randos in the streets, but anyone operating in a camp or the government.
Propaganda is not what these people actually believe, it's the tool they use to give cowards plausible deniability. Those participating actively, and those not stopping it.
Because you're calling that statistic a Nazi dog whistle, and that means you're saying it's fake / fabricated and pro-Nazi propaganda somehow. It may not be what you intended, but it is the meaning of the phrasing you used.
Surely the lack of opposable thumbs made it difficult to hold a ruler long enough to measure the Earth precisely.