Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)UP
Posts
7
Comments
356
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • In my opinion, adguard is worth in two cases: if you need Firewall+VPN on an unrooted device (every other thing I tried was either Firewall or VPN, no chance of getting them to work at the same time), or if you're installing it on a family member's/acquaintance's device, so that they have an on/off switch if something goes wrong.

    Unless you don't fit in one of those two cases adguard will do little to nothing for you

  • It's not a matter of bypassing, it's about achieving the same result by different means.

    I don't know what exactly adguard does once those settings are enabled, but a private DNS (or even adguard's free public dns, if you don't want to put in the commitment and prefer a "set it and forget it" approach) gives you both tracking and malware protection (I strongly suggest watching this video to understand what a private DNS does and how https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUG57ynLb8I)

    In general, I think DNS blocking is the easiest, quickest and the most effective way to block ads on your devices

  • Adguard app does block ads and trackers in the free version too, you just need to set up dns filtering and select adguard DNS. You can also create a nextdns account for free and run it through adguard to have more control over what you're blocking.

    In general, adblocker for browser > DNS > anything else.

  • It was founded in Russia in 2009, then moved its headquarters from Moscow to Cyprus almost 10 years ago, in 2014 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdGuard

    They've been a solid presence in the privacy scene for years now, contributing to spread privacy awareness and not incurring in a single major controvesy/scandal so far.

    They're legit imo, and they provide solid services

    Not sure about the basis for the claims of "shadiness"