UnRelatedBurner @ UnRelatedBurner @sh.itjust.works

Posts

19

Comments

693

Joined

2 yr. ago

Based, wanna hop on?

Back in the day, when I didn't know better I did try this. With Norton I believe. I'm not gonna drag this story, it ruined my boot, but for some reason it didn't steal or encrypt anything (Makes me think if I just fucked up the install instead of it being malicious). After re-installing Windows everything went back to normal, and I managed to get BitDefender & Malwarebytes another way xd. Good ol' times. 2/3 AV worked

You wrote a statement, not a question.

everything

I'm not going to cut throats over banners, chill out. And also it'd seem I wasn't clear with my points. I understand that AI can still produce art. My point was that if AI is used to make art it's used the same way as any other tool, but randomly generating pictures is an edge case.

One could argue that this is just natural evolution. Before, when you made a nice picture (let's say on a canvas) it was one-of-a-kind, and that made it more special, more art-y. But, if you'd have used AI instead, you could have gotten an infinite number pictures all with similar artistic values. However, I'd say that this isn't true, because afaik sometimes what the machine gives back to you is very bad (by means of not achieving the goals of the artist), and you have to regenerate it. This means that you can't call "all" AI generated images art even if it was made with care.

Compared to your music example, I agree. But, I believe you haven't considered the fact that it is still one-of-a-kind. No matter the instrument (because the new electronic sounds are just that basically).

Picture the scenario where somebody (A nobody with no goals, motives, or deep thoughts) just press a couple of buttons and some toon starts playing. "It's pleasing ig" is the only feeling you get from it. Or get someone, with passion and a dream, to use the same method, but instead of stopping at the first toon, they continue to improve it, to refine it, to redo it as many times as it takes for it to be perfect. Imo I'd consider scenario A's result and B's failed attempts to not be art, B's result however is art.

Well, I wasn't active before now :p

just wanted to put my two cents out there

shhhh

While this is very cool, and a nice idea. I have to vote aginst it. AI art is just so uncanny and soulless.

In my opinion it'd be way better to have human-drawn art as the banner. For starters AI generated "art" can't really even be called art. "Art" implies that it has some meaning, value, message, or a memory even. AI can make art tho, when you mastered it and use it the same as painter uses a brush. I don't think a daily random gen in compatible with putting care into what you create. If we switch the banner every day with another auto generated picture, it'll be just that; a cool picture. But if we maybe switch it up every year (for it to not be stale) with an art competition it'll have love in it at least, with possibilty for all kind of valuables, such as refrences or a unique style.

You could get around this issue with an avatar. A mascot (of the community) if you will. After having the mascot fed to an AI it can generate it in any position doing anything with any background, allowing us to not waste the idea of another commenter (haui), who suggested that it should be dynamic, that it should change depending on what happened the previous day. It could be refreshed daily, it could be made dynamic, and it'll have soul.

I can't draw. But I think I speak for others when I say that I wouldn't mind drawing a character for a community that I can thank thousands of dollars to.

ngl, I just call it "glass" and "reflection"

You'd have just spent it on something else useless. Take this as a reminder.

Btw, how's your lab report going?

Kind of a clickbait title

"In March, GPT-4 correctly identified the number 17077 as a prime number in 97.6% of the cases. Surprisingly, just three months later, this accuracy plunged dramatically to a mere 2.4%. Conversely, the GPT-3.5 model showed contrasting results. The March version only managed to answer the same question correctly 7.4% of the time, while the June version exhibited a remarkable improvement, achieving an 86.8% accuracy rate."

source: https://techstartups.com/2023/07/20/chatgpts-accuracy-in-solving-basic-math-declined-drastically-dropping-from-98-to-2-within-a-few-months-study-finds/

I'm guessing Option "VariableRefresh" "false". I really wouldn't want to do this, I game a lot and I dislike Vsync.

Thanks for the help, but as I'd like to continue with my FreeSync, I'll have to look for another solution, sry.

It'd be a nice change of pace to have an issue fixed with an update.

Could be, as I recall it happening when I walked back to my pc. Yesterday I set the sleep to 1 minuted and played with it a bit, couldn't replicate it. As a matter of fact it didn't even happen on it's own. I haven't updated so idk what's going on.

Did you figure out how to replicate it? Others are writing some good ideas, but I have no idea how to test them.

I'll try it with pkill then. Would you mind explaining the difference, please? And the "big surprise"

I can't seem to find that setting.

Just turned it off, let's see. Still donno how to test so.. waiting game.

Sorry for the late response, I'm not feeling well. Might try this, when I get a bit better. Thanks for the tip!

Thanks, but nope. My lockscreen works. It's everything after it lol.