Ultraviolet @ Ultraviolet @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

581

Joined

2 yr. ago

Sure. Let's just apply that consistently then. Atoms are binary, the vast majority (with fewer than 1% of atoms being exceptions) can be accurately identified as one of two distinct elements, hydrogen or helium.

Yep. Same software, same hardware, just different config files.

It's probably a blue area in a red state. They intentionally open fewer polling places there as a voter suppression tactic, hoping people will see the line and figure their vote doesn't have enough weight to justify the time.

The problem is focusing on danger implies strength. They want the guy that's dangerous to their enemies. Mocking him erodes some of that power.

So where are the "Republicans are good for the economy" voters now?

They think it's better to make things worse if you personally can avoid blame for it on a technicality.

A fire hurricane would be terrifying.

Not just COVID, Trump's main strategy in 2020 was to turn "taking the pandemic seriously" into a partisan issue in order to make it so early and mail voting become disproportionately blue (there was no significant correlation in the past) while poisoning the well on those ballots' legitimacy.

Instead of blaming doctors for not martyring themselves for the Hippocratic oath, we should be putting the blame on the lawmakers that created this scenario to begin with.

We're only yelling "Nazi" because the other side is yelling "heil Hitler".

You're asking the question in bad faith. Yes, you are correct that there exists a way to make our current system less democratic than it is. This is why Trump has openly stated he wants to use military force to murder his political opposition and create a one party state. The fact that it could be worse doesn't mean we should be thankful to the Republicans for giving us a choice, that's like thanking someone who robbed you at gunpoint for the generous choice of your money or your life.

This is what's called sophistry. The current system is the second least democratic option possible. There are countless ways to make it better and only one way to make it worse. So why, if you're truly asking in good faith, fixate on the one way to make it worse as the only possible change?

How is a gmod shitpost anything but a return to tradition?

I forget the exact name of it, but there's a game theory problem adjacent to but not exactly the Prisoner's Dilemma. Everyone votes yes or no, and if yes wins, everyone loses $20, but everyone who voted no loses $200. If no wins, nothing happens.

This is basically a variation of that problem.

The definition of emergency is absurdly specific though. The corpse inside you can't just be dead, it can't just be decomposing, the fragments of putrefying corpse matter must be coursing through your blood at a sufficient concentration before anything can legally be done.

The hospital was following Texas law. Any doctor who helped her would have been arrested.

You know there's a significant Puerto Rican population in New York and Florida, right?

Pigs are also more likely to side with the fascists.

It's also why they're opposed to lead pipe removal. They'll never admit it, but lead poisoning is a major contributor to why people are stupid enough to vote for them.

The worrying part is the implications of what they're claiming to sell. They're selling an imagined future in which there exists a class of sapient beings with no legal rights that corporations can freely enslave. How far that is from the reality of the tech doesn't matter, it's absolutely horrifying that this is something the ruling class wants enough to invest billions of dollars just for the chance of fantasizing about it.