Turun @ Turun @feddit.de

Posts

0

Comments

599

Joined

2 yr. ago

Take the bottle in your hand such that the cap is close to your index finger and thumb and the bottom of the bottle is across from the on your palm. Grab it tight and make sure the cap is on tight. Then use your whole arm to swing the bottle. You want to hold it in front of you and with a lot of force (don't let go, lol) swing it downwards, passing your hips. Use your shoulder a bit, but mostly your elbow joint for movement. Put as much speed into the movement as you can. Repeat five times. The centrifugal force will push the content of the bottle towards the cap. Then you can squirt out the remaining sauce, or take off the cap with all remaining sauce on there e.g. ketchup is non-liquid enough to stay on the cap pretty good.

I heavily disagree, because it puts judgement into the hands of the masses.

But a photo should be proof enough and if the government (whoever is responsible for issuing fines) confirms it is illegal then the owner of the vehicle gets a fine - and whoever reported it gets 10% of it! Imagine how much money could be raised that way to improve schools and stuff!

The other person said it better than I ever could.

But also: they can be a protagonist. It's just that these movies are usually pretty shit.

If your app automatically opens the link, yes.

Not all do that though.

You mean the first after Austria, Poland and Hungary?

They probably have two, regardless of where they live. Unless they are in a wheelchair.

But silverfish are not bad either? They don't carry disease.

Yes you can

I love the /-style of writing it, precisely because of the way it would be pronounced.

Yes, but there is a difference between a protagonist that happens to be queer and a protagonist whose whole persona is that they are queer.

It gets worse when them being queer is the only justification for why they are good instead of the movie showing us they are a good person (or strong, or charismatic, or whatever).

The same can apply to female protagonists as well.

Yes. You can test this by selecting something, closing that window and attempting to paste. It won't work. Closing the window removes the information about what was highlighted, so there is nothing to paste. If it were to copy upon selection you'd still be able to paste.

Is it though? Most developed nations had 70+% vaccination rates iirc. New Zealand had more than 90+%.

Thanks. So docker manipulates iptabels directly, thereby bypassing ufw rules. (Your previous comment was just really vague)

True, don't know how I missed that.

I guessed it to be ai generated, because

• the horses are very artsy, but undefined
• the sky is easy to generate for ai
• the landscape as well. There is simply not a lot the ai can do wrong to make a landscape clearly fake looking
• undefined city from afar is like the one thing ai is seriously good at.

I bet that while we have less general pollution and less dumping trash in the environment kinda things, we have developed much more potent insecticides. And if those insecticides do not degrade within a few weeks they will accumulate in the earth and the water.

Edit: Wikipedia about one type of modern pesticides: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neonicotinoid

If you are worried that an attacker may have compromised your router and that key auth is not secure enough, then yes it would make sense.

I move ssh to a non-default port, only allow key based auth and install fail2ban. This is enough for me. It protects against automated attacks hitting port 22 and prevents brute force.

Can you elaborate on that? I'm curious what you mean.

You don't actually have a "holier than thou" sentence in your comment, but

one which a lot of people would rather deny, rather than admit their part in perpetuating it,

Sure does come close. I think this is the reason why there are such negative reactions to your top level comment.

If you insist on the definition as it is in formal language theory.

In practice regex is widely used to mean the pattern matching thing that also supports back references.

Wikipedia suggests using the term "regular expressions" for the language theory thing and "regex" for the programming language (PCRE) thing. I agree and would even go further and say that any time one wants to refer to the concept as it is used in formal language theory they should explicitly specify that they are talking about the theoretical concept, not the regex implementation as it is found in most programming languages.