TropicalDingdong @ TropicalDingdong @lemmy.world

"The future ain’t what it used to be."

---

Read more

Posts

66

Comments

6,204

Joined

2 yr. ago

Like.. This defense of Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris approach to the election keeps getting defended. You are arguing that "less bad" should be good enough.

Listen the fuck up: IT ISN'T

We have the fucking data. We ran the fucking experiment.

Less bad LOSES FUCKING ELECTIONS!!

Democrats need to do better and if you are running static interference for their failed approach to electoralism: you are trying to lose the next election.

Your phony, insincere approach to electorism ignores the facts on the ground that for the American Electorate, less bad, it DOESN'T WIN ELECTIONS.

Democrats want to win a certain way where they don't have to be better for voters.

If you keep apologizing for it or defending it, you are committing to losing future elections.

they litterally both campaigned on who could be worse about genocide.

It's Joe's fault for not giving us a better option

Not sharing a tent with these fucks.

the same ol’ disgusting centrist cynicism that continuously loses Democrats elections.

👆

I’d suggest some gaming museum or tech fair.

I think a trip to an arcade with a wide range of different vintage games.

What you say matters more than what you say you say. Your "realism" is just the same ol' disgusting centrist cynicism that continuously loses Democrats elections.

I get it. Its the big tent party. We're forced to share an umbrella with centrists. But centrists SUCK at winning elections. They're FUCKING bad at it, and they're the ones who share your views. You have to decide between winning elections, or repeating this ideology.

Expresses explicitly centrist talking points:

lol I’m no centrist

2008: Run a progressive platform and focusing on motivating Democrats with policies they want. Win.

2012: Run a progressive platform and focusing on motivating Democrats with policies they want. Win.

2016: Run a centrist/ RW platform and focusing on trying to capture Republican voters. Lose.

2020: Run a progressive platform and focusing on motivating Democrats with policies they want. Win.

2024: Run a centrist/ RW platform and focusing on trying to capture Republican voters. Lose.

If you/ yours wins the ideological fight for what Democrats need to do differently to be competitive, they'll never win another election.

Its toxic, its wrong, its strategically idiotic. It loses elections. You should keep this opinion to yourself or just go be a Republican. Democrats can't win with you in the party.

I think its largely psychological/ strategic.

Show you can strike the bridge, you show the enemy they can be struck, they need to dedicate more resources to defending it.

Also, actively destroying the bridge would be a huge knock to Putin's ability to maintain appearances.

Finally, actually disrupting the bridge would be good tactically. But thats proving harder to do. This is the third attempt?

shush I'm almost there.

it might seem odd to you.

I had that thing fall off my leaf. Just left it off and have had no issues.

probably wanted to see the results of it before launching any long range strikes on the bridge

Maybe get them to show their hand with regards to the repair resources/ facilities.

They go high, we go taco.

It knows when you've been bad or good, so be good, for goodness sakes!

2 gp per day

I'm this economy?

No shit right.

If it weren't for the decades of sane washing liberal and conservative talking heads have offered the mind of bullshit narratives they push, none of this would have ever been able to be come established.

Violence is the only answer they'll listen to.

I've heard there's a dark, comic version, but you can only find it online.