I swear the Internet breeds a certain kind of idiot allergic to reading comprehension.
As bad as cops are, there are material constraints placed on them. Thats the reality you are in. They aren't always enforced, they aren't good enough, but they exist.
There are no constraints on a 3%'er.
I've lined up against the PPB and I've lined up against Proud Boys.
I'm not fucking remotely concerned about the PPB in the same way that I am about white nationalists.
And if your 🪱 🧠 is to far gone to comprehend the difference, leave the decisions to people who have some experience.
Begin to collect information. Take mental notes on suspicious vehicles. Of a certain kind. Begin regular meetings with birds of a feather. Keep connecting with like minded people. Develop, even a limited understanding, of opsec and infosec. Learn a bit of GIS. Get onto a secure messaging system.
I think these are going to be far bigger than planned. Trumps lil' crackdown in LA put a spotlight on it. Trumps obviously in the wrong. I would expect these to be 10-15 x bigger than the hands off protests.
Parrots can be uhh. Hard to get back when they get out.
Some neighbor had a parrot get out a few weeks ago. Parrots name was Rascal. So Rascal set up shop in the Mango tree next to my house. Which was. Then his owner, an older lady, she finally found him, and stood outside of my house all day for like, 3 fucking days yelling "RASCAL!! You get down from there Rascal!!". Like 8AM to 6PM practically, the lady just yelling "RASCAL!! RASCAL YOU GET DOWN FROM THERE!!"
And Rascal just stayed up there, kinda chuckling to themselves.
Eventually they were able to coax Rascal home I suppose. But man. That owner was super annoying.
Your literal response is why I think you have no conception of what works in terms of politics. Your framework was WRONG. It didn't predict things. The people you rely on for their "popular wisdon": They GOT IT WRONG!!
If you keep just reusing the same mental frameworks when they don't predict future states of the world, NO ONE, should listen to you. If your mind doesn't agree with the evidence, you need to change your mind dude.
Its self evident dude. People defending Biden staying in the race were fucking idiots. They've been demonstrated to be wrong. Horribly wrong. Handing the country to fascism wrong. The people saying that Biden needed to step down were right.
Listen to the people who got it right. Use their frameworks for evaluating reality.
IF you continue using the same broken/ wrong frame work for thinking these things through, you are just repeating their same idiotic approach.
Biden’s brain was melting live on stage and it was still considered extremely risky to call for him to step aside.
By idiots. The people hand wringing the risk were, and are, idiots.
Schumer is just bad at his job and failing to meet the moment. There’s no way Hogg comes away better both by publicly declaring his enemies list and including one of the most powerful members of the party on it.
I think you have no conception of what works in terms of politics.
Chuck Schumer needs to be primaried within a party who elected him as minority leader?
Chuck Schumer ABSOLUTELY needs to be primaried, and if Hogg had been able to say that, citing the basically infinite series of failures that Schumer has represented, Hogg would have won this fight.
This is politics; Democrats are literally the least popular they've ever been, and Hogg was willing to speak to that: thats how you make political hay. What Hogg did was the first step in the dance you do to change peoples minds. It was politically savvy to pick up on that and move on it. But he had no follow up. He got a great first punch in, and had no gas for round two. He fumbled on the second step.
I mean, I don't think thats even relevant and I think people that use that as a basis for decision making should be ignored. That level of analysis is basically hand wringing, and I could really give a shit if any one like the presentation. If the critique or analysis is correct, too fucking bad if you don't like the presentation.
Hogg started by saying the right thing. Conservative/ Blue-Dog/ Blue-MAGA Democrats need to be primaried and ejected from the party.
But when pushed, Hogg's actual analysis was completely lacking. He couldn't answer "Which Democrats should be primaried?" or "Who are the good Democrats are?". When he did answer those question, the answers were fucking stupid and he was obviously a bit shook and hadn't thought through what the answer should be.
He should have taken the message to some friendly leftist media outlets and fucking work shopped it so he was more prepared to answer those really obvious question.