Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TR
Posts
1
Comments
562
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Reporting the reactions of both sides is technically neutral.

    However I totally agree that ‘both sides-ing’ in terms of legitimising shitty views is unhealthy. I think the piece does not legitimise the xtian views as much as holding them up as the entrenched mindset that the SC is trying to (rightly) break.

  • Indeed. I certainly do not support the xtian whackos. And the Satanic club sounds like great thing.

    The Guardian is definitely a left-leaning paper so accusations of bias against the ‘satanic club’ is likely not true.

    I think the reporting is accurate in that it’s telling the reader about the reaction ‘on the ground’ to this piece of social progress, by the parochial xtians.

    People are left to read what they want into the reporting (neutral) but I really don’t think it’s ‘promoting’ the xtian view.

  • “IN A WORLD…

    WHERE SEMI-WOODEN ARBOREAL FRUITS HAVE FAST-ASS LEGS.

    AND WRENCHES CAN GET HACKIFIED.

    ONLY ONE MACHINE CAN SAVE US ALL.

    BOSCH TICKLEFINGER IS:

    THE NUTRUNNER.

    APPEARING AT A CINEMA NEAR YOU.

    PARENTAL ADVICE RECOMMENDED “