Traister101 @ Traister101 @lemmy.today

Yo whatup

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

334

Joined

2 yr. ago

What ramdon ass language could they possibly be pulling out of their ass for you to he completely unable to write a for loop? I've yet to see a for loop, or really any sort of loop that doesn't look pretty much exactly like the standard C style for loop

    
for(int x = 0; x < z; x++) {
}


  

If you have a C style language with iterator for loops like C++, Java and friends you almost certainly have this syntax

    
for(int x : numbers) {
}


  

Python has exclusively iterator for loops with this syntax

    
for x in range(z)


  

The only real difference is that instead of a colon : you use the in token.

At best I can see the need for a quick refresh on what the exact syntax is but if your a senior any languages you actually use should have a template for junk like this. I don't think I've manually written a loop in ages, I just type out iter for an iterator for loop or when I rarely need an index fori and the rest gets stamped out for me.

If your being tested on random languages you can simply just not be familiar with a language. I haven't touched Zig once but I'd totally be down to learn it. Everybody whos got a couple languages under their belt knows how easy it is to pick up new ones.

There is also that sure but biologically people want to have kids, the extreme cost of living experienced by many prevents them from having kids

I'm sorry you incorrectly believe conservatives are a political party

At no point did I say Republicans

If we stop electing conservatives yes

Philanthropy is ineffective, that's our current system and it's not working

Bro that's crazy has it crossed your mind that I don't want to be rich? Put me in that position and I'd be paying for ads and shit to get the government to tax people like me more.

Your not gonna catch me on any of that "Oh so you think wealthy people shouldn't exist" bs either btw. In a vacuum I think people should be able to make a lot of money from stuff they do but billionaires shouldn't exist full stop. The amount of good you can do with merely one billion dollars is genuinely kind of inconceivable and we have multiple multi-billionaires, and not anywhere close to enough good being done by them. They simply shouldn't exist. They'll be just as happy being multimillionaires though I'd quite like taxes to dramatically ramp up once your in the 10 millions, even that is far above where middle class is meant to be.

Yes yes someday all the money will trickle down on me and it'll be my turn to be rich and then I'll get angry when my "all" my wealth is taken away from me and I'm just well off. They might as well murder me at that point I mean sheesh

If you have more money than you could spend in a lifetime yes, you should be robbed at gunpoint to feed family's.

Actual new battery tech? I didn't see the capacity listed/compared to a normal lith-ion of the same volume but it does say they have some issues with voltage. I'm not sure how annoying that actually is (not super good with electricity) but this looks rather promising. Might see smart watches and similar devices without any flat hard surfaces using these combined with flexable screen tech. Course like always this stuff is extremely reliant on the capacity being workable, if it's too much less than the equivalent in lith-ion it's just not going to get used.

The media wouldn't be able to, nobody would be there to write the story

Coool so we're really truly committed to this route then okay. Is the only way out of this to try and get everybody to ban together and stop going to work until every last one of these evil fucks are removed from power? I can't even be sure the judge is actually okay with this seeing how willing and blatant this administration is with corruption.

I wonder why they waited until just after the first quarter. Hmmmmm...

Yeah I thought we already knew this? He's literally talked about how you have to beat your girlfriends when they don't respect you and nasty shit like that.

Whoops, meant flags

It's actually so bad lol. Idk what Microsoft has against - for args flags but it's fuckn annoying

Stores have a obscene loss rate from workers damaging product, forgetting to scan it out, it simply coming broken and other such "Just business" costs. Theft is seriously just not a problem. I work at a Fred Myers and awhile back we locked up our soap isle and whatever. Know what we do now? We leave that shit unlocked because it's stupid and a waste of people's time to have to go and open it up. Know what else we did? We installed a new system for the carts which is supposed to prevent theft (if you don't go through self checkout or a register one of the wheels locks up when you try to leave). I has been believe 3 months now. It's either still not actually been activated or people who steel stuff don't use carts... weird. And my final thing is how just completely irrelevant even pretty significant numbers are in the grand scheme of things. I know for a fact we've had 10k worth of stuff get yoinked. Good chunk of money, no debating that however how much of an impact does that actually make on the store? A single department makes more than that in a day in profit. If that doesn't immediately seem possible that's only 100 people spending $100 each (assuming 100% profits for simplicity). That's like an hour ish if two registers are open and self checkout is closed.

TLDR theft (at least for the big stores) is completely irrelevant, it's such a small slice of the pie compared to other losses.

ಠ_ಠ gross

But that obviously wouldn't stop them from having him disappeared. Heck I don't even think that's off the table now

Genuinely. I had a discussion with somebody at work which boiled down to "Yeah but Trump stored the top secret documents in an unused bathroom while Hillary had emails in a private server which ended up being poorly secured so Hillary is actually the much worse security violation."