Skip Navigation

ToxicDivinity [comrade/them]
ToxicDivinity [comrade/them] @ ToxicDivinity @hexbear.net
Posts
0
Comments
103
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Thanks for the explanation. I responded to you in another comment thread about this stuff so I won't respond again here.

  • I like your disdain for journalists and capitalism and the state but sometimes stories stick around for a long time because they're actually still on-going. Pandemics usually have multiple cycles. There usually isn't just one big spread and that's it. The fact that the state f'ed up the response to the initial wave just makes more waves more likely.

    Journos are wrong a lot but not 100% of the time just like 95% lol

  • I think because you seem to be agreeing with the poster who is against masking? But I'm not sure because his post is removed now.

    When you said

    Because it generates clicks (and thus revenue) for media conglomerates.

    What generates clicks?

    I'm just asking because the post you were responding to got removed so I'm missing context

  • stop trolling man, you've been brigading this hexbear post for hours, I hope we defederate from your instance

  • YOUR APPLICATION TO JOIN THE FALLACY POLICE HAS BEEN DENIED

    we found that you have used too many logical fallacies in the past to properly represent our organization

  • I can copy and paste a response to every comment you make as well. It doesn't make you right, you just copypasta your response and move on. If that isn't a logical fallacy I don't know what is

  • You made the argument, the burden of proof is on you. Stop trying to make other people do your work for you

  • 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 The fallacy police are on their way, you really did it now

  • I’m not responsible for your lack of comprehension, learn about logical fallacies or I'm gonna have to call the fallacy police and you don't want to deal with them

  • oh man

    theres just so many logical fallacies from whiskey pickle here I don't even know where to start, I'll just leave this little guide for you maybe you can read up on this stuff a little.

  • ding ding ding! we got an association fallacy, just because you think 1 responder is a troll doesn't mean they're all trolls, you didn't prove that, you just used a fallacy

  • thats another strawman, you can't prove that these people are trolls, they're just regular people expressing their opinions same as you

  • thats a strawman, you're strawmanning your opponent by pretending that they have no real argument even though you've seen their argument and ignored it.