Touching_Grass @ Touching_Grass @lemmy.world

Posts

7

Comments

870

Joined

2 yr. ago

The fact is a guy shot negligently at a kid for playing a speaker at him. Its like speaking to a 1900 Arab whose saying it's justified to cut a criminals hands off because his legal system deemed it so. The country is beyond reasonable and as I said is fairly evil when it comes to valuing life. You're using a broken measuring stick to measure

Well fucking shoot me then ffs

Saying get away would have been enough.

I am using a definition

Yea cause the real victim is the guy who had sounds player next to his ear. Not Not the guy who was shot.

Lol no its the case here. The mental gymnastic used to justify shooting people in America is fucking bizarre

Not justifiable in a country unless the country is a place that's insane

Best to shoot anyways just in case.

Not life threatening. Completely reasonable to feel threatened in many safe situations. Which is why walking around armed leads to this negligence and the devaluing of human life to justify it.

a threat like a cell phone and a friend watching

You could get shot for mildly scaring someone in america.

Guys he this person walked at me aggressively and I couldn't tell if they'd kill me so I shot them. Bless merica where life doesn't mean jack shit.

So shooting to what? Say hello

Just shot a non threatening kid because they were annoying

In a violent society of course they wouldn't. That's the sin of it all. Its normalized

Don't care what the legal definition is. My definition is that is not an assault

Not confusing anything. Its not an assault that warrants any kind of violent reaction let alone a fatal one

So blow their brains out. Totally justified response in certain cultures

How was it an assault?