Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
4
Comments
335
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • Now might be a good opportunity for something along those lines, but you'd still need a lot of favors to make an anti copaganda show, even for established producers. The biggest advantage for such a show is how angry a lot of black women are right now, including in that industry.

    The election has lost the Democratic party a lot of faith from those who threw more support behind them than anyone. They are on thin ice now, and local failures from law enforcement will have political consequences that they never could've imagined before. There is more motivation than ever to rock the boat now that the ship is on the rocks.

  • Their job is not inherently immoral like for cops. They provide an essential public service

  • A lot of the military are fully aware of how the US fucks them, but still support it as a potential force for good. A majority hated Trump during his 1st term, and many will leave if he tries to use them again civilians during his 2nd.

  • rule

    Jump
  • He did that so he could enjoy his hunting trips in peace. There was also a forgettable president or two that seemed like better people than him. He's top 5, but not better than Lincoln or Carter.

    Carter was almost a neolib, but he promoted the humanitarian side of liberalism better than almost every other president. He was too weak for the neoliberals and too neoliberal for the social democrats.

  • rule

    Jump
  • Nah. He was a badass, but not a good person

  • rule

    Jump
  • Teddy was a big time imperialist

  • Unfortunately, a lot of fire and EMTs are close with cops. They often work together in stressful situations, and they bond over their shared trauma of seeing fucked up tragedy. Even though they provide fundamentally different services, I'd avoid insulting cops in front of them.

  • Yup! They're sorted by use case as well 😊

  • Sounds about right

  • 5 rule

    Jump
  • I can't read 😑

  • Idk. I laugh everytime I see the pipe comic after watching a dude analyze it for an hour.

  • 5 rule

    Jump
  • That'd be 2 inches tho

  • Honey always seemed fishy. What's the tldr on what they were actually up to?

  • I doubt a single image can say something so broad reaching about someone's cognition. You'd need multiple images displayed in more standardized conditions to know anything with confidence. People could be seeing this on all sorts of displays, from an OLED smartphone screen with blue light filter enabled, to an HDR monitor with custom color calibration. They could have the image fill different proportions of their field of view and see it in very different emotional contexts. A single data point cannot say anything about a person's cognition.

    On top of that, I have no idea what you mean by high vs low level vision. Are you talking about bottom-up vs top-down processing more generally?

    Regardless, a single image on 196 can't fully demonstrate which way you lean on anything.

  • All 3d images on a flat surface are an illusion in the same way as this image. It simply uses very limited depth cues when compared to most images.