TootSweet @ TootSweet @lemmy.world

Posts

23

Comments

1,693

Joined

2 yr. ago

I gave you an upvote.

I could see a case for using "working person" instead of "worker." It's definitely not the sort of thing that's agreed to be exploitative language (yet?) though.

What I do for sure bristle at a lot more is referring to people as "resources." Like, when planning a project, discussing how many "resources" can be "put on the project". Definitely feels dehumanizing.

No, that's a U.S. state in the north-west of the contiguous 48.

I love how it turned into a musical.

Saying this as nicely as I can, you're well out of touch with consensus reality in a way that caused unwanted disruption in the technology community. The mods took action (specifically the action of banning you) to maintain a harassment-free environment.

And no, you don't have any sort of sixth sense about porn addiction. Do you need help?

You were pushing porn addiction propaganda on people who said nothing about being addicted to anything in particular, let alone porn.

You used to be able to say pretty much whatever you wanted on Lemmy.

• I sense an implicit "and not be banned for it" in your statement
• it's not true
• I doubt it's been true literally anywhere ever, particularly online
• had it been true here, it wouldn't have been a good thing

Happy cake day!

Oh shit, is it just the eventual end product of teenage rebelliousness?

And you have to act out Megazord assembly when you promote a pawn.

Na you were pushing a weird personal agenda and harassing people rather than dropping it.

Also, not everything you don't like is "turning into Reddit".

Doubles as a checkers set. The only pieces that king themselves.

DALLE LLaMA

Go:

Makes note in game master secret ideas list

So they won intentionally. ;)

Failing? I call that a win.

• Completely nonsensical post content and title.
• URL in title which makes me think it might be spam/advertisement for catholicchemistry.com is.
• Literally nothing about the post is remotely relevant to the community it's posted in.

Looks like hallucinating "aGeNtIc Ai" to me. The text itself is too clean to be stable diffusion or DALL-E or whatever, so I'm guessing it's not exactly that, but it's far too weird not make me think it might be some kind of misbehaving algorithm.

I haven't looked at your post history yet to see if all of your posts are similarly nonsensical, so I still don't know if I'm responding to a human.

To be fair, similarly nonsensical posts existed before AI. Maybe that's just your thing. It's definitely not really what this (or any other, really) community is for, however.

AI generated, maybe?

"Oh, am I supposed to kiss it?"

describing IntelliJ as "good".

Shots fired back. 😈