Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TI
TimewornTraveler @ TimewornTraveler @lemm.ee
Posts
34
Comments
2,046
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I dont mean this as a “dunk” but more of a how neat is that

    It's truly shameful that disclaimers like these feel necessary in this age of shitting on everyone else online. Lemmy users suck too.

  • So... just to check my understanding, what you're saying is that whether or not cats can survive on a vegan diet, it doesn't matter? Right? You're saying that you decided the admins overstepped and you regret approaching ambiguity the way you did? I suppose that seems reasonable. There's plenty of misinfo all over Lemmy as is, and as such there's gotta be various ways we can handle it - from top-down bans to trusting the readers.

    As for the diet stuff, what, are they using lab-grown meat? Is that the TLDR here?

    EDIT: Guys I am just checking my understanding - maybe check your own if you think such a comment does not contribute to the discussion.

  • Hell yeah. Likewise to you.

    I think as long as we 1) stay skeptical in our understanding of all systems whilst putting in effort at understanding those systems better and 2) act in accordance with our values in the political process, then we will be doing the good that we thought we would be doing if we constantly consumed news media and designed those beliefs/actions according to that influence. Except we're less influenced by that particular force and less demotivated by anxiety and dread.

    The big stuff we're probably gonna hear about anyway. I learned that Trump got shot within two hours.

  • this is so prevalent... and yet a friend told me that he "lost respect" for me because I said I am choosing to abstain from following the news this year.

    he acknowledged there's nothing that I could personally do about the vast majority of it, but that I still have a duty to "bear witness". compared it to 1930 Germany and said if he were going down he would want to know about it!

  • Well, no, the trauma is the event itself. The reaction to it is post-traumatic stress. If that stress gets in the way of your day-to-day functioning, then it could be called PTSD (but there's like pages and pages of diagnostic criteria too).

  • Yeaaahhhh Nietzsche was making a very different point about convalescence but of course popular culture bastardized it. If Nietzsche knew that he was going to become an anthem for white girl positivity, he would... well, he'd probably gloat because he predicted that. But his gloating would look like misery.

  • Oh come on, now you're just feigning ignorance. The body types correspond to both modes of human sexual dimorphic presentations. Just because you take away the names doesn't mean the dimorphic traits are absent. It IS a sexually dimorphic character creation system. So within that, let's look at who gets to be the default and who gets to be the "second sex" (highly recommend reading de Beauvoir, again). OP is taking issue with not just the veiled binary but also the hierarchy within it.

    Let me put it this way. Imagine if the body types were no longer sexually dimorphic but had varied skin tones. And despite the fact that we know skin tones present in a variety of ways, they only offered light peach skin tones and dark skin tones. And they made the secondary one the darker skin tone. Maybe you or I would have a problem with it, maybe we wouldn't. But could you understand why someone might take issue with that? It's a fair objection to make, whether we can conceive of a solution or not.

    And hey I think OP's solution would apply pretty well here: let us create characters with a variety of presentations! Or maybe just take away the "light" and "dark" options? A lot of people in this thread responded with great rationale from game dev standpoints, and that stuff is valid. I can see why devs do things the way they do. But I can also see why OP doesn't like it.

  • Hey, behavioral health clinician here. I get this a lot. The question is about boundaries. I'm seeing three kinds of responses: 1) lie 2) leave boundaries down 3) assert yourself. Obviously answer three is what you're looking for, but the question is how. I like what u/FuglyDuck said: “ I appreciate the invitation but I have a policy to not meet patients outside of work or take photos with patients.”

    Don't think about boundaries as rules so much as walls. People who can't assert themselves tend to have that wall down all the time and let anyone in. This can be uncomfortable, especially if you are a private person. So what is it that prevents the wall from coming up? A professional would stop here and let you figure out the rest but since I'm just a rando on the internet I'll just take a guess and say maybe there's some fear and guilt involved in not wanting to hurt the other person's feelings or disappoint them or maybe just not knowing how to handle the change in atmosphere that you believe will come after setting the boundary up. And then I'd wanna know what makes you feel responsible for protecting their feelings, or what makes you assume it will hurt their feelings/change the atmosphere, and if there's a way to carry yourself that preserves that emotion/atmosphere even after the wall is raised a bit. Phew, that was a long sentence. Anyway the more I ramble the less helpful this sounds, and that's fine since I'm just a rando on the internet and not giving professional advice. Have a great day!

  • Owner shot himself after bankrupting the company through embezzlement and we had to vacate all residential patients within a week knowing we wouldn't get paid and would be losing our jobs, haha!

  • yikes, OP wasn't calling this secondary any more than Simone de Beauvoir was when she published The Second Sex.... it's an actual problem that deserves recognition, and shitting on someone for recognizing it? you're the one reinforcing the problem now!!

    OP was merely gesturing at another instance of patriarchal culture treating the feminine as secondary by putting it second. not a controversial revelation tbh quite trite really