Timecircleline @ Timecircleline @sh.itjust.works

Posts

4

Comments

664

Joined

2 yr. ago

Gotta agree that the first Mario party for switch was terrible. Hated the concept of star points, or whatever they're called.

The last one felt just ok- like a return to form but not a stand out. 7/10 maybe. I've only done one party of Jamboree and its definitely my favourite of the switch by far. Might be on par with MP 6 for me for replayability. Lots of anti frustration features brought in, gameplay feels quick, minigames I've played so far were fun. I don't regret the purchase but also have bought every single Mario Party since the first one, even when disappointing, so maybe wait for someone else's opinion.

Pastoral- Moondog

Dream Eater!

Gonna eat your dreams and gain your knowledge

Sphere by Michael Crichton

Vitiligist

The hot is implied, no need to spell it out.

Too many dudes when all you need is a wife.

Driver salaries aren't part of the cost cap.

TIL! Thank you!

I think you're spot on with the cost cap. Plus other teams wanting to emulate McLaren's move with Piastri- they have arguably one of the strongest driver lineups right now and he's in his second season.

Did they wind up finding the knife? Last I heard they weren't able to, which cast doubt on its existence.

How can they when schools are so dangerous!?

Aunt is Thea in Greek

I don't think Joker 2 had a test screening

If everyone had Wednesday off you would need to contend with the public though.

Giga Chad move.

I didn't even know about the pouch stuff, I thought you were saying his weird lumpy anatomy and I thought yeah that tracks.

The context of ancient Rome?

Futurama!

But his hair plugs were so painful!

Hey friend, I fully agree with your stance. I was going through the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms and was actually surprised by how much is permitted. I always thought that Canada's freedom of expression laws were more restrictive than other places- as I have heard of people (non-Canadians) being banned from the country based on their conduct.

Specifically, falsehoods are protected "Being content-neutral, the Charter also protects the expression of both truths and falsehoods (Canada (Attorney General) v. JTI-Macdonald Corp., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 610 "

So that was disappointing. Also, there have been similar cases in the past with homophobic flyers that were deemed legal because the content did not meet the threshold to be considered hate speech.

I wonder whether it would be permissible to distribute flyers that say "stop cancer treatment for children! God doesn't make mistakes!" Borrowing the verbiage from the flyers in the article.

I'm feeling very disappointed at the moment. I don't disagree with the mom's actions at all. The content was fundementally abhorrent to her beliefs (and science).