Sure, but since nobody can know the will of God, then why does that even have to be taken into account? Isn't it like trying to do math, but you don't know and can't know what X is? You just got to find your way by some other means and forget X ever even existed.
I wonder that about quite many things. I feel like I'm not in the target audience for almost anything new.
I mean there's not even anything particularly wrong about that stuff. It's just that I only have so many hours in a day, and there's plenty interesting content out there for my niche interests, so I don't want to spend it watching some braind numbing entertainment that's mostly directed at the "masses"
What is the difference exactly? It's both animal testing. It's going to be cruel by its very nature. They're testing on animals because they're not allowed to test on humans. If they could they would.
Everyone here acting like this is all black and white. Without animal testing there's no modern medicine. That is a choise we could have made but didn't. Thousands of animals had to suffer so that millions of people would not. From an utilitairian point of view it's a no-brainer but it's still cruel as fuck and there's no getting around that. Animal testing or no - both leads to individuals suffering unecessarily.
I, for one aren't willing to take the moral high ground here, because I eat meat ie. take part in the chicken/pig holocaust.
Considering that I get a few new bot followers every day, and has been for probably over a year now, but my total follower count isn't increasing much, I'm quessing they're indeed removing these accounts, but new ones just keep popping up. That would pretty much be on par with why he says he's going to start charging for it.
I didn't really have an opinion on the Israel/Palestine conflict or about Netanyahu as a person before he was a quest on Lex Fridman's podcast. He seemed like an extremely disingenuous person, with obviously very politician answers to the questions presented to him. That made me, for the first time, to look into what this conflict is about and though it's still quite nuanced, my view however isn't especially favourable to Israel now.
Is he just supposed to pay for the running of twitter out of his pocket or what? It says there they've lost 50% of advertisers, and are making negative profit. That isn't sustainable. The purchase of twitter has cost him 40-something billion, and still keeps costing him even more. It's not about just wanting more profit, but to atleast break even.
What makes you think he's short on cash? Wealthy people don't store their wealth in cash anyways. The money is tied to the stocks of the companies they're running. That's why he needed to lend the money for twitter too; he doesn't have that kind of cash, but people are willing to borrow it to him because of his wealth.
If you just had read the article you'd see that they have lost 50% of the advertisers and are losing money. This isn't about wanting more money just for the sake of it. No company can exist if their finances are on the negative.
He's the wealthiest man in the world. That doesn't mean he has a lair full of cash and just wants more. People really struggle to understand the difference between wealth and money in the bank. This isn't about hoarding money just for the sake of it.
Don't quote me on this but I believe his thing is what the handle says; knees over toes. It used to be considered to be bad for your joints doing exercises such as deep squats for example, but his belief is that it's the exact opposite. He used to have really bad knees himself, and couldn't really play basketball like he wanted to, but by doing these exercises he was able to strenghten his knees to the point they no longer cause issues for him. The main exercise he's recommending is pulling a sled backwards. He tells about Finnish lumberjacks who used to drag logs backwards like this and how they had super strong knees.
Veikkaan, että pidemmän päälle pörssisähö tulee halvemmaksi. Kiinteähintaisella sopimuksella voittaa vain, kun ukrainan sodan kaltainen ennalta arvaamaton tapahtuma pistää markkinat sekaisin. Kiinteähintainen sopimus on arvio mitä siitä mitä pörssisähkö tulisi maksamaan ja vielä vähän päälle. Jotta kiinteähintainen tulisi pörssisähköä halvemmaksi pitäisi niiden käytännössä myydä sähköä tappiolla.
Smart is a weird word and I don't know if I would describe me as that.
I rather consider myself as rational/intellectual. I might not know a lot of things, but I feel like the way I think is somewhat uncommon when compared to the general population. Emotions don't cloud my judgement as much, and I seem to have this ability to take few steps back and observe things from afar. Because of this I'm a really mixed bag when it comes to my views on current affairs, and by knowing my stance on few issues doesn't really help you to figure out what I think about the rest. I can usually also be honest to myself about facts even when it's inconvenient for me.
I'm the kind of person who you ask a simple question from, and you get a lecture in return, because I'm physically unable to give overly simplified answers to complex, nuanced questions which is basically all of them.
Finnish language doesn't have gender specific pronous. Our equivalance for he/she is "hän" and it just refers to a person - not any specific gender. You can literally identify as anything you like, and "hän" still includes to you. Seems like the obvious solution to the "issue".
One of my favourite things about reddit was that I could sort by controversial, and would often find a reasonable take explaining the view of the opposing side. Even when I don't agree with it, I still want to hear it, and what I often found the case to be is that I didn't quite agree with either sides and (unsurprisingly) the thruth is somewhere on the middle.
On Lemmy this often is not the case and I pretty much only hear one side of the argument and not many bothers to write a reasonable take arguing against the apparent view of the masses because it'll just receive downvotes and bad faith counter-arguments. The extreme left is just as unreasonable as the extreme right and it's often the majority in the middle who simply stays silent. There seems to be almost no space for nuance and complexity.
I've blocked 130 users so far and usually add few people to that list every day.
Even on a small place like Lemmy there's still way more content than I can pay attention to. If I see someone posting stupid shit and I go see their profile and discover that's the only kind of content they post then by blocking them I just increase the signal to noise ratio on my feed. Quality over quantity.
However I try to stick to my principles when blocking. One "fuck this person" -message doesn't get you blocked unless by a quick glance I can find several of them in your history.
Also my instance has defederated like 20 instances so that alone probably adds 500 users to that list.
I'm a plumber. Just let it slide this time, okay?