The_Lemmington_Post @ The_Lemmington_Post @discuss.online

Posts

7

Comments

33

Joined

1 yr. ago

My post was meant lightheartedly about gamifying content tagging, not seriously advocating for increased corporate control of the internet.

Yeah an appeal process to mitigate human bias would be nice.

Having AGI as moderators would be a futuristic dream come true. However, until that becomes a reality, it's crucial to consider the well-being of human moderators who are exposed to disturbing content like CSAM and graphic images. I believe it would be important to provide moderators with the ability to decrease their moderation levels to avoid such content.

Why would anyone contribute? Would you pay someone to work for you if they don't want to listen to anything you have to say? When they close issues without allowing the community to provide input, that's exactly what they are doing. If they were too busy to engage with the issue tracker, I wouldn't mind. However, if they simply appear to close issues with numerous upvotes and no downvotes, it frustrates me.

Yeah, this seems to favor people who stick to one account, but I also enjoy seeing some of the regular posters here. Even though I like creating new accounts, I wouldn't mind if they were given moderation privileges to share the workload. I'm unsure about the implementation details, so I can't comment on the protocol. What I do know is that Reddit moderation sucks, while Discourse moderation rocks.

People keep mentioning StackOverflow even though I specifically mention Discourse. The two do similar things but one does it right and the other doesn't. I don't really understand how it would be inconvenient to create accounts. If you are active and behave you get moderation privileges otherwise you get the same experience as you do now.

The benefit of this is that only individuals who are interested will progress up the trust level ladder. If you are indifferent, you will have the same experience as currently. I believe this benefits everyone involved.

I don't have any hope left for Lemmy in this regard, but hopefully, some other Fediverse projects, other than Misskey, will improve the moderation system. Reddit-style moderation is one of the biggest jokes on the Internet.

I'm surprised that only one platform in the fediverse has copied Discourse; they copy Reddit instead, with the biggest joke of a moderation system on the Internet.

Nobody says that about Discourse, perhaps they have implemented it better, and Discourse is the one I based the idea on.

I am, to the github project.

Look at how well tagged pictures are in this website: https://safebooru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list

The poster isn't necessarily the one doing the tagging. Those tags are added by everybody.

You are probably thinking about StackExchange, I don't see anybody saying anything about popularity when talking about Discourse. It's a matter of doing it like Discourse and not like StackExchange.

I have the same right they have to ask for contributions and support for something they are going to do their way.

I don't really care all that much about any particular issue. I enjoy copying the ideas suggested by others in the fediverse and transforming them into new issues, as many individuals do not take this initiative.