I feel though that, as many others, it compares the carbon footprint of production (panels and batteries) vs the footprint of burning only.
By looking at the source of the carbon footprint, it seems that they take into account only the CO2 output of the energy factories, but extraction, transportation and storage has a non-negligible carbon footprint.
Ignoring the technology itself, I found it interesting that it has a lot less trouble with verbs compared to nouns (tho the article does not give much information about it).
Would it mean that humans keeps actions very separate (even if similar), while keeping things and concepts more clustered together? Is being precise on what is happening much more important than clearly specifying the subject and object of the action?
Thank you OP. From now on, to people they say AI generated images cannot be art, I will reply with the top left. It is pure poetry. A modern masterpiece.
Sure, let's not vote for the person that dedicated years on studying history, sociology, economics and political science (or "social studies" if you prefer). Let's instead vote for the person that stepped on everyone's heads to make sure he and his company are successful! What could go wrong? Running a country is exactly the same as running a factory, no?
And I'm sorry that so many universities are heavily left-leaning. I'm sure that if the right stops burning books at every corner there would be more right-leaning universities (tho politics should always stay out of classes in my opinion).
Confusingly enough, in Italy I believe it is not quite a thing "elbow pasta". Personally I have never heard anyone refer to any kind of pasta as "gomiti", though Google showed me that they indeed exist. I have always heard the ones that looks like elbows in other names.
+1 for Photopea. I found it extremely friendly coming from Photoshop, has a lot of functionalities and works great on computers where I can't/won't install Photoshop. YMMV though, since you want to use it as a full replacement and I used it only for simple retouching/modifications when I'm not on the desktop
Nice article.
I feel though that, as many others, it compares the carbon footprint of production (panels and batteries) vs the footprint of burning only. By looking at the source of the carbon footprint, it seems that they take into account only the CO2 output of the energy factories, but extraction, transportation and storage has a non-negligible carbon footprint.