'For too long, Apple has operated a walled garden around its products': The EU forces Apple to open its closed system to third parties
TheRealKuni @ TheRealKuni @midwest.social Posts 0Comments 303Joined 2 yr. ago
TheRealKuni @ TheRealKuni @midwest.social
Posts
0
Comments
303
Joined
2 yr. ago
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Anti-competitive and monopolistic, sure. Anti-consumer? Eh.
Don’t get me wrong, Apple is just as evil as the next guy. Their practices reinforce their market position in an insidious way. But in many respects Apple performs better on the consumer front than, say, their primary competitor Google. Not in every way, but I wouldn’t call their devices “anti-consumer.”
If one of your primary concerns as a consumer is an open platform then yeah, I can see you rejecting outright Apple devices. This could in turn lead to being dismissive of the concerns of those whose priorities differ from yours, though I would strongly advise against such a lack of empathy over something as insignificant as a platform choice. Regardless, curtailing their practices is still important.
If we don’t stop bad behavior because it doesn’t affect us directly, we set bad precedents. Regulatory actions are an important tool.
Fallacy of relative privation. “X is worse than Y, so Y doesn’t matter.” Rent and food prices are important, too, but regulatory bodies don’t operate on a zero sum system. Multiple things can be addressed with multiple efforts. It’s not like the EU is saying “we can ignore starvation and homelessness because at least we cracked down on Apple.”