TheOakTree @ TheOakTree @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

488

Joined

2 yr. ago

Bobert, eventually known as Boberto, really didn't really appreciate that the names stuck

So you generate a completely random grid of pixels. Tell bot 1 to unblur it, then bot 2 evaluates how much it resembles the prompts, then bot 1 takes that evaluation and uses it to unblur the image a bit better, bot 2 evaluates again, and so on and so on until you have an image that passes evaluation. So bot 1 has never even been trained on other peopes data.

I'm sorry, I'm not understanding. So Bot 1 relies on Bot 2 to evaluate Bot 1's iterative images. Is Bot 2 not trained on the Mona Lisa in order to determine if the image resembles the Mona Lisa? And if Bot 2 has no idea what the Mona Lisa or its artist's works look like, can it reliably guide Bot 1 through turning blurs into an image that resembles the Mona Lisa?

The site you linked says YouTube pays "$0.0.00069 per view" lol

Didn't Spotify join Epic's side in the Epic v Apple lawsuit over the app store?

...did you hear Steve Jobs died to figma?

(Sorry I had to)

Don't feel guilty. It is the normalization of expected behavior at a workplace that forces you to behave in a way that you do not want to.

It is their fault for fostering a space where people are not allowed to present as unhappy, tired, stressed out, or otherwise below neutral, even if said state doesn't impact the quality of your work or communication.

We build relationships all around us where we are willing to understand that just because someone is not-happy does not mean that they don't want to speak to you in good faith. We also typically understand that not everybody who seems gleeful has good intentions.

Lmao I'm so dumb, I was very tired and wrote this in a state of "brain please wake up" limbo.

Point still stands, just 0 to 100 and -17.777 to -37.778

I feel like 0-100F encompasses most living temperatures in the USA. It's also a cleaner scale (in terms of human-comfortable temperatures) than 32 to 37.779 in that regard. 0F is the temperature where humans need to make sure they aren't wet and make sure their drinking water isn't left outside. 100F is the temperature where we need to be worrying about heat stroke and accelerated dehydration.

So, making this human-intuitive scale of temperatures a 0-100 range makes it easier to understand for a layperson.

Half Life 3 ain't comin... to toooooown!

The problem is that all of this requires infrastructure spending.

Agreed. This is spending that our country isn't willing to do, mostly because of what we already have (both in terms of infrastructure and in political influence). Personally, I hate this.

As for Cali's duck curve issue, desalination is a great idea, but expansion of renewables and storage should really come first. Keep in mind that the current Cali grid generates much less dirty power during the day, where solar covers a majority of demand. Should we divert that solar power to desalination, we would need to ramp up dirty power generation during the day, and we would continue to generate dirty power at night.

Even if you only get 30% of the power back with green hydrogen it is power you had too much of in the first place.

While I agree with you, we also have to consider what this would do at scale. The 70% of excess power that you lose here translates to wear on the solar panel systems that is never realized into power. That is, the systems will wear at the same rate, but the amount of power you can utilize over the lifespan of the systems is decreased. It's still a better solution than not implementing these at all, but I'd be wary as to how reluctant our society would be to the spending, especially if the ratio of cost to utilization(?) becomes skewed.

We've been perfectly fine wasting energy for over a century, I don't see why we should pearl clutch now.

Well, that's an issue in of itself. It'd be great if we could waste less power in conventional generation, but it'd be even better if we could match or even beat that with renewables. I hope we can reach a point where everyone can agree to implement renewables sooner than later, but I don't see dirty power's political influence allowing for changes until renewable is equal to or better than dirty power. Which sucks, but a lot about our political system sucks.

Let’s add in the cost of batteries as their own thing

I don't know if this is a fair thing to do. Yes, we could charge it from any other source, but we aren't (intentionally) overgenerating power from sources like coal, gas, etc. Thus, the need for implementing that storage largely depends on renewables.

I also feel like factoring out the costs of storage implementation leaves more gaps for combustion generation supporters to criticize renewables. I would rather be honest about the upfront costs and instead emphasize the long term benefits of renewables, both in cost and cleanliness.

The problem right now is that we need to find better ways to turn renewable energy into stable, reliable power. The power production problem is highly dependent on balancing power generation and demand, and any excess energy must be stored, used, or wasted.

The main benefit of gas/coal/etc. is that we can (almost) always control the output to a close margin based off of demand projections, which are typically updated every 15 minutes. That being said, the drawbacks of using this form of generation are obvious and need to be addressed.

For renewables like solar and wind, we can't always predict the output, so in the larger scale of power balance, we need to supplement it with something that can make up for fluctuations in generation. In the current system, this is from conventional sources.

The goal is to implement a robust energy storage system, ideally one that can hold a huge amount of excess renewable power during the day (largely due to solar), and reliable output that power when it is needed (higher demand at night). I would love to see the day where our nation is fully powered by renewables, and I'm super happy to see that there have been pushes to build up renewables, but the target scenario relies on big advancements in storage.

I would suggest anyone who is interested in what I said to look up "california duck curve solar" for some reading on what challenges solar overgen presents in bright and sunny states.

All that being said... we can do it! I sincerely hope we reach a point where we can phase out dirty generation across the globe, but it will take a lot of time and effort.

source: taking several power systems courses as part of my EE degree

I also hate being

...forreal? You do realize dealership markups in the past few years have jumped as high as 40%?

https://markups.org

It probably is, a la Ferrari.

You post Star Trek memes and you think Canada is socialist? AHAHAHAHAHA

An effects pedal collector's dream, really.

Here's the Piped link because the bot did not pick this one up.

The goal isn't to make it hollow, the goal is to shrink the size proportional to honest participation, so that it doesn't have an outsized influence on the general population.

This sounds very in-line with the experienced detailed to me by an ex who grew up in Tyler, Texas.