TheLeadenSea @ TheLeadenSea @sh.itjust.works

they/them

---

Read more

Posts

6

Comments

188

Joined

2 mo. ago

Nah, CH should be tsh, we need a new letter for SH, and maybe C could be the kh sound like in loch

Red dead redemption

I just pronounce colonise kernelise for consistency

There are certain topics I have to self censor about on Lemmy for fear of moderator action.

This is just used to shut people down who have legitimate complaints. Like, replace 'sealions' with 'black people' in the comic, and I would be surprised to find many people who still think it's ok.

Internet Archive

Intelligence Artiticialle

So people too young or too privacy conscious to use those major platforms will move to nicher porn sites. Doesn't sound like a bad idea at all... /s

I know a Sigourney in real life. But I think she might have been named after the actress.

Sometimes the word alternate should be replaced with the word bullshit

Good, there are very few countries (if any) you should unilaterally support. Most governments commit atrocities.

Take DHT blockers

Am I paranoid?

Why didn't the American people build ships across the ocean? Maybe to Eastern Asia, that would be closer. Africa is also close to Brazil.

Pardon me, but I did not understand this sentence at all. Can you please elaborate (or eli5) it?

Sorry about that! I was basically trying to say that if a trans person tells you their gender, and you then treat them like you would treat a cis person of that gender* (ie, any gendered behaviours that are still in society, you would apply to them - as much as we both want to abolish gender norms), then you're doing great!

*things that are still gendered in our society include pronoun usage, calling someone gendered terms like brother, niece, etc, bathroom usage, single gender activities, and so in

I hope that's any more clear, if it's not I apologise!

What does this have to do with technology?

Oh, I'm not saying you should change this post, no, of course not!

And I'm also not trying to work at cross purposes with you either, we both want the same thing, I think.

Just noting maybe a better approach that might work, for your and others' reference, that was all.

Censoring opinions you disagree with is not the way to go. You're in the minority on this, so if that did happen, it would be your opinions that were censored, not theirs. I don't think either should be removed.

And equating Israel, as bad as it is, to Nazi Germany is absolutely a false comparison and a minimisation of the harm the Nazis caused not just to Jews, but also to gay men, Roma and Sinti people, Polish people, political dissidents, etc.

though, that by using the term 'private property', that would be, to the populace, creating a new term and having to educate everyone on what it means. Conversely, the term 'corporate property' that I just made up, without having to be explicitly defined, is immediately obvious in its meaning to everyone already.