TheGalacticVoid @ TheGalacticVoid @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

604

Joined

2 yr. ago

She might not recycle the same tune, but it kinda seems like she recycles the same themes verbatim. I'd say she's closer to Papa John's than a good quality pizza shop. Her music is probably good, but I doubt that it's usually great.

An asshole is someone who mistreats someone when they don't deserve it or when they're not malicious.

Exactly. The vast majority of people aren't brick walls, they're literally people with their own experiences and set of knowledge. They're all going to make decisions using that set because they literally don't know what other people experience.

Online anyway, I've seen a lot more talk about issues from inside the US. Sure, you can say that more socialized healthcare, more safety nets, walkability etc. are European-inspired, but I can't say the same about environment, wages, tuition, gerrymandering, and especially racism. I don't agree with the idea that we were ever content with the status quo because it was inherently unfair for a lot of Americans in obvious ways.

Yet it is stupid to ignore the progress we made despite the political climate. The No Surprises Act and Inflation Reduction Act come to mind. No amount of people saying "lmaooo american healthcare HAHAHA" is actually going to fix our healthcare, and repeatedly focusing on the bad without the good just represents a lack of understanding of actual issues.

Maybe you should grow up and stop seeing the world as black and white.

When there's a clean supply of drugs green-lit by a superpower like the US, wouldn't it naturally be exported to other countries? Sure, the cartel would still exist, but for the drug trade specifically, better availability of safe, quality drugs internationally would reduce international demand for cartel drugs, no? Wouldn't other countries start manufacturing said drugs to import into the US as well, making it easier to fill the black market with regulated products?

If you buy new, I highly recommend Lenovo.

I'll probably be fine, but a lot of people won't be.

Plus it's hard to believe that it will since it's creator owned and the creators who own it mostly have integrity.

We already have a system like that in the US. Whoever has a wider reach and/or higher budget gets more turnout. A big reason why Obama won was because of his presence on social media, and Trump won because of the insane amount of media coverage he has. The current system gives prederence to voters who treat elections like simple popularity contests, whereas mandatory voting would force people who somewhat pay attention to current events and not to campaigns to be counted.

The alternative is voter suppression, which leads to unequal access. Also, given that more passionate individuals are gonna seek out a ballot vs. others, the result is going to be skewed in favor of those passionate people regardless of their understanding of reality or truthfullness.

I wouldn't be surprised if VR booms soon in a hyper-competitive environment like phones pre-2016. We already had a boom, but there was a tiny market for decent VR. Now that Meta, Apple, and Samsung are making decent headsets at different price points, it's only a matter of time before Huawei, Xiaomi, and Oppo start doing crazy stuff that sells well. Hopefully, Valve and HTC become even bigger players as well.

Shut up

You literally replied to me twice.

The irony is that constant obsessions/hyperfocus is a symptom of ADHD.

Roughly 13% of the world is diagnosed with ADHD. Yes, there are plenty of people who should not get that diagnosed, and yes, plenty of people fall through the cracks when they get screened. However, I'll assume those 2 groups are roughly equal and cancel out.

It is VERY clear that he has one of the many symptoms of ADHD. Yes, that symptom alone could be caused by several conditions, which is what I mentioned in my post. However, everyone in this thread who suggested it might be ADHD specified to get it checked out. They did NOT say that they definitively have ADHD. Nobody in this thread made a diagnosis. They told OP to see a doctor because of their concerns.

Here is what your argument boils down to:

1. If it's a medical condition, you shouldn't talk about it at all
2. Because there are far more people without ADHD than with, you should speak as if ADHD people basically don't exist.

1 is a laughable argument because if this were a post about a physical condition, like a weird bump, it would definitely be acceptable to tell someone to go see a doctor.

2 is basically saying that language shouldn't be inclusive of minority groups because minority groups "have to deal with reality." That is an incredibly ignorant mindset to have, and if that's how you think, I'm genuinely appalled.

If you yourself had ADHD or heavily researched the condition via doctor's presentations or papers, you'd probably understand why people on the internet love to bring it up so much. The diagnostic criteria in some cases (for example, in the DSM-5) is god awful. Many doctors out there dismiss ADHD for stupid reasons like "it's only for children!!" because they don't understand it. There are too many doctors out there who only diagnose based on disproven stereotypes. The end result is a crap-ton of people who are screwed in life because they are ill-fitted to do the same stuff that the majority can do. Said people are screwed until they are 30 or 40 or 50 when they finally encounter a doctor that listens to them and considers something despite it being uncommon.

If you still think telling 800 billion people, "it's reality," is in any way productive and not harmful, I can't help you.

It's like telling a fish to climb a waterfall. All saying "just do it and move on" does is reinforce the idea that the other person isn't good enough.

Try to do homework assignments at 6 PM get distracted realize it's 11 PM and time to sleep stay up anyway to do it get distracted every 5 minutes get back on track each time because you're incredibly stressed rake a nap because you're sleepy and can't think wake up at 6 AM realizing it's the next day and you only finished half the assignment be late for the bus by 1 minute shamefully wake up parents to drive you or walk to school end up being 10 minutes late for class turn in your half-complete assignment, which you'll probably get at most a 50 on sit through a bunch of uninteresting classes rarely be able to pay attention barely understand the material because of sleepiness go home repeat

That is only a slight exaggeration of undiagnosed ADHD. The most unrealistic parts are the length of the first distraction (should be 2 hours max) and the grades (probably around 70%). None of this comes from a lack of trying.

Here's an analogy of how distractions happen. Say that you're at home doing the dishes. 5 minutes later, you teleport about a mile away in a random direction. From then on, you teleport a mile in a random direction every 15 or so seconds. You eventually are teleported back to your house, where you can finally walk back to the kitchen and finish the dishes without teleporting for several minutes.

Usually, we think about a tangentially related topic over and over again until we're so far off that we realize what we're supposed to be doing. This is also one aspect of ADHD - it impacts so many miniscule things that add up to become giant problems.

If you don't think ADHD is a serious concern, you should look up some statistics regarding it. ADHD people have significantly lower life expectancies on average. More seriously, they are 5x more likely to attempt suicide than people without it. Also, people with ADHD are really likely to have other conditions/disorders as well.

For non-Indian food, I've seen coconut and olive oil used, almost never ghee.

To add on to the other commenters, medication alone doesn't usually solve things. Rather, it makes you more able to implement solutions to your problems. It's why therapy is pushed so hard.

You could also be on the wrong meds. It can take a lot of experimentation before they work.