Do you have any documentation on how this work ? Is there a name to this special protocol? Is it a recent addition to the wifi standard ?
Again a wifi AP doesn't send data to a specific client. So how does an AP can enforce that one client can't read a frame for someone else that is properly authenticated? How would an AP prevent someone spoofing mac addresses from receiving that data ?
I'm really confused by this feature I never heard of even when I was playing with aircrack and so on. Yes sometimes your mac address can get filtered but even that is not really difficult to avoid.
Sorry I have so many questions but I honestly did quite some "tinkering" with wifi years ago and none of this sounds familiar.
As far as I know there isn't really any client separation on wifi. It's a shared medium.
At least I don't see anything preventing you from reading someone else traffic. So anything unencrypted on a wifi is also accessible to any other clients.
I had tools more than 10 years ago that could automatically hijack session cookies on wifi for anybody connected and not using https.
Edit: I know, I shouldn't give a shit. But writing a fairly long comment to share my knowledge on this only to see it immediately downvoted without any explanation kind of sucks.
So I'm removing this comment and will not interact here anymore.
IMHO everyone is entirely missing the point pointing their finger at Boeing.
The main issue is the FAA and how it failed to control Boeing. It's obvious a business will try to sacrifice safety for money. But there should be check and balances. Someone making sure a business doesn't do that.
The FAA let Boeing supervise itself.
Just to be clear some of the higher up at Boeing are criminals but so is the cop that told him he could police himself.
The problem was solved by Nvidia, then AMD made it cheap and accessible and not requiring a dedicated hardware module.
For years and years Nvidia increased artificially by up to 150 euros many Gsync screens and for no legitimate reason. Initially there was NO compatibility with free sync at all.
Nvidia wasn't kindly solving a gamers problem at least to after the first year of release of that tech. They were forcibly selling expensive hardware modules nobody needed or wanted. And long after freesync showed you could do it just as well without this expensive requirements.
This hardware module they insisted on selling wasn't solving a technical problem but a money one.
I don't even think anyone was ever able to differentiate between the different qualities of "sync techs".
Just want to point out that the allergic person seemed to have taken every precautions possible to avoid this. She asked the waiter and the chef multiple times to verify that the allergen wouldn't be there and they repeatedly said it was the case.
I think there were 4 times where they confirmed that the meal was safe. It wasn't at all.
So it looked like a really really bad mistake from the restaurant staff.
Not OP but everytime I used the verbose output of ssh it didn't help me one bit. Even adding outrageous verbosity I was still quite confused on what step failed and which didn't.
I'm probably just bad at understanding SSH but i don't know it seems like ssh workflow includes many trial and error until it finds a way to connect.
Imo the verbose output of SSH is often not very helpful if you don't know very well ssh in the first place. Obviously it is still worth a shot and a good advice but don't expect ssh to clearly state what is going on :)
Trump chooses a topic, lies constantly about it and let people get tired fact checking. Would crowd size be on the news without Trump activating that subject?
I thought it was pretty clear China is an ally of Putin..
Didn't Russia and China do a military exercise together very recently? Chineses bombers were photographed with a Russian jet escort. And it was pretty clear Russia and China wanted to be seen together.
They do deliver embargoed parts to Russia as you said and are training with Russia and not NATO countries.
But discrediting someone's opinion by just posting this meme is NOT toxic ?
So it's toxic to assume someone might be a Russian bot but it is not toxic to disregard the opinion of everybody that said that ?
You know there are bots online. Maybe not much here but there was definitely many on Reddit. So bots are real but someone that points out a bot must be wrong.
Thanks ! That's exactly how I think it could be implemented but that confirms that this is certainly not something you can find commonly where I live.
That confirms the fact that if you use the same wifi and everyone has entered the same encryption key then there is no real client isolation...
It's cool that wifi keeps evolving. It comes a long way from the WEP beginnings.