Tartas1995 @ Tartas1995 @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

1

Comments

450

Joined

2 yr. ago

Technically not a cryptosis as onecoin wasn't a cryptocurrency, that was part of the scam.

While I understand and agree with you, the obvious counterargument is how many people get serviced and the generated value of them being served. I mean people won't argue that a car is better than a bus because the car produces less carbon. What I think is the better way to highlight the ridiculousness of those icons, a newspaper website produces more carbon (if energy source is producing carbon) than a server that just return the certification icon. So newspaper website is worse? That is how this certification works... Low information density gets rewarded. Which is contra productive if the goal is an energy efficient web.

To be fair, the service in the screenshot, tries to estimate the average carbon over the year and collects data to improve estimated that counter some of my critic, but it doesn't fix the ignorance to the kind of data provided and rewards low data density to some degree

With the awareness that some people might call me names for saying that... AC4: black flag wasn't even that good of a game in my opinion

I don't understand the meme, like what it tries to joke about. the motto of the kernel is to not break userspace, right? So I assume the joke is based on that but I don't see the joke.

Dude, can you be less rude? Calling me a liar, without point out a lie. At best, you found a misunderstanding of cve on my end which wouldn't be a lie and isn't in the part that you called a lie. Also I don't think that there was a misunderstanding on my end of what cve means. Then you call me basically a clueless idiot for not having a clue about web servers. While I actually currently am working for a multi billion dollars companies as a backend dev and never worked anything but web dev. Then you complain about a straw man when you don't bother to express what your actual argument was and I had to guess.

You might realize that I am not bothering to argue your points, there is a simple reason why, you are being a dick. Make your points clearly like you did just a moment ago and don't be rude while doing it and you get an interesting conversation.

In case, you are curious, I am actually rather neutral on whether or not, it should be cves. I see the devs reasons and think they are reasonable and I understand why f5 would report it. A new fork seems to be an overreaction though. I bet you didn't expect me to hold this position because you were busy being a dick instead of having a conversation

There is an astounding number of lies/misrepresentations in your post, good lord.

1. I never said it isn't an issue. Dos is the issue. It is a vulnerability.
2. No. CVE are not required. Like never. There is no legal requirements. The c in CVE stands for common btw... You know what is not common, Experimental features on non stable releases.
3. The stables are not affected. To quote from https://www.nginx.com/blog/updating-nginx-for-the-vulnerabilities-in-the-http-3-module/ about cve-2024-24989, "NGINX Open source mainline version 1.25.4. (The latest NGINX Open source stable version 1.24.0 is not affected.)" And about CVE-2024-24990, "NGINX Open source mainline version 1.25.4. (The latest NGINX Open source stable version 1.24.0 is not affected.)"
4. Yes and no. Remember the c in cve?
5. How is it a lie to say that they informed people through a mail list, when they did that? Remember you said I was lying? Also didn't you say they wanted to keep it quiet to fix in secret, while they inform the public? Isn't that a lie? (Also, you call it a cve in this point, well the dev didn't think of it as one and he alerted the users. So they satisfied your "least" requirement for a cve while not thinking of it as a cve.)
6. My statement is once again not a lie. But let's talk about your stuck transaction. Your transaction isn't "stuck" if you use transactions in your database, but besides that you used an experimental feature on a non stable release on a publicly facing service and the "stuck" transaction is your issue? You are fucking without a condom, my friend. And That experimental feature might just crash randomly, due to memory leaks or what not, and your transaction is stuck too.

Where were my lies? I mean I showed you yours.

Have you looked into the CVE? Apparently it is a non issue. You could use it to dos a service that have an experimental feature enabled, which is disabled by default, on a non stable Version. I understand the dev. CVE should be for serious issues. And they alerted their users over an email list

It can be used for dos, as it is crashing workers, but they will be restarted anyway.

How is that related to my comment and how does that answer my request for clarification? I am sorry but this seem completely unrelated.

Yes but what about this whataboutism? And honestly I am fairly certain it ain't as much as Bitcoin. People usually focus on 1 thing to get it done because moving to the next. I bet you try to do that at work too.

Could you show me that assumption? I don't see that assumption present in my comment. Please help me to understand your perspective. Thanks.

You typed so much and understood so little.

I don't think pascal's wager works. Which is why I said, I said he is right about one thing which is the infinites reward fucking up everything. IF!!! there is a god, and he rewards and punishes you like pascal believed, then everything becomes irrelevant compared to it. Failing to follow god would be an extremist action. Unacceptable due to the unmeasurable damage it would cause. Think about it, in an atheistic world, a Terror Attack is bad, like really bad, but the damage is finite. In pascal's world, disbelief has worse consequences. The harm is bigger, to a literally infinite amount. For pascal, your disbelief should be worse than bombing a Christian church while there is a service.

Which misses the point of my argument.

I don't say you are wrong. But my point is strictly about what people believe and how these beliefs should be quite important and turn "moderation" to "extermism" from their pov.

I think the argument for moderation is the worst in the religious context.

Pascal was right about his Wager in one way. If god exists, it should change everything for you. Especially the christian one. Eternity in pain or pleasure outweighs everything.

If that is your reality, how is failing god moderation?

Seriously if you don't want people to die from cancer at all, how is that not extermist?

Are reference point defines "moderation"? Look at us vs eu politics.

Even if you want to define moderation as the average or median position in a society, then Nazism can be moderation if you get enough Nazi together.

Wake up, my fellow extremist.

I am sorry to disappoint. I don't know.

Seems like they don't have anydesk installed. :/

Did they have hackers on their computer?

Are you working as a it support at international world wide net tech support?

That is surprisingly accurate

Interesting... I think I quit windows shortly after skipping 8 to go 10. So I might haven't given windows 10 a fair chance

Honestly, my experience was the opposite. When I had issues with windows, which I had a lot. Reinstalling was often the last and only solution. On Linux, when I had an issue, it was a little learning experience and running 1 command. I guess reinstalling is easier... So maybe not the opposite.