Tartas1995 @ Tartas1995 @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

1

Comments

450

Joined

2 yr. ago

Following an ideal while being based on free labor is difficult

It doesn't seem to be a debate. "Microkernels are better" "yes but I don't have the time for it" but thanks

Thanks! I will look into

I have heard that before in a joke setting, I would love to hear genuine arguments for and against it.

I tried to express my understanding of the arguments. I don't know and I couldn't argue either case to a point that it is worth adding to the conversation

I understand your point and I want to make clear that my own opinion is not in favor of systemd or against systemd. I am very much neutral. I just expressed my understanding of the arguments. But I welcome the discussion.

The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically "make it do 1 thing and that very well", systemd goes against that idea.

You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can't run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.

Yeah that's a stereotype. Some many brilliant people and somehow the fuck ups (not the people but their fuck ups) generate all the attention. I didn't think of that stereotype and was curious. But seriously blaming a (maybe even a fresh)PhD for being bad at coding is both fair and unfair but no peer review is not on them.

I don't like cryptic message like this, especially if the repo seems to be gone

There isn't a legal precedent. Unless I misunderstood, this is a settlement and settlements aren't! Legal precedent. Which is why big e.g. pharma likes them, because then they don't have the legal precedent for the next case.

So just to make sure, I am not American and I am wondering if I get this right. If prompt by the choice between Biden who (at least from your pov) supports genocide and trump who said clearly that he would let Russia take Ukraine, and has been completely silent on the matter which aligns with his exclusive focus on america, and had Israeli minister of national security express support for him as he expects trump to give them for freedom to fight Hamas, you want someone who supports Palestine to vote for trump? Just wondering.

Edit: trump stated that Israel would have to "finish the problem" in Gaza. So trump is now vocally supporting the events described by you as a genocide.

I didn't mean it so serious. I just tried to express that you seem to have experience with it and I am wondering what you have to deal with. I am sorry if it came across negatively.

So you are saying you are the expert in unshitifying queries? What is the most common thing that needs to be unshitified?

As a dev, yes usually. It is certainly the better starting point.

Honestly I am mostly bothered by the "reddit atheist" stereotype. Most of the atheist even on Reddit, that I have met, even in Reddit, were as annoying or pleasant as everyone else. But it feels like if you oppose religious nonsense as it gets pushed in your face online, "everyone" thinks you are some radical who hates all e.g. christians, while in reality you might intentionally buy some handmade crafts for the local church to support some charity and support your elderly local community by rewarding their social efforts.

I am telling you this because hopefully it will make you feel a little better. Our head of it blames devs for slow queries.

I believe so and that would render you (or anyone) unable to tell the difference between ai and "true" ai

Qualia is, if I am not mistaken, totally subjective. My argument is that how could you tell that a computer doesn't have qualia and prove to me that you have qualia. While I wouldn't limit it to qualia. What can you detect in other people that an ai couldn't replicate? Because as long as they are able to replicate all these qualities, you can't tell if an ai is "true" or not, as it might have those qualities or might just replicate them.

The difference between "ai" and "true ai" is as vague as it gets. Are you a true intelligent agent? Or just a "intelligent agent"? Like seriously how are you different to a machine with inputs and outputs and a bunch of seemingly "random" things happening in-between

Fair perspective. It is a scam happing in the crypto sphere but that doesn't necessarily make her a cryptosis. I mean, it comes down to what makes a cryptosis a cryptosis, acting in the crypto sphere or believing in crypto or holding crypto?